'68 318/727 vs 340/727 trans mounts

I did see rock auto and some other places listing the spool mount as an option too, like you did, makes things confusing for sure.

Yes! (confusing) I punched in all the correct info. but put 340 as engine size,(what it is now), and the spool type mount came up. so got me thinking maybe the 340's were "engineered" stronger with the spool type mount. Thanks for letting me/us know what is correct!

Heard the poly mounts caused problems like trany cross member cracks and vibrations, but thought I'd take a chance on one of them. I feel all the rubber mounts are made outside of the US now a days and might be junk.