Opinions on these carburetor restrictors....

-
We used to have to run something like that when I ran dirt circle track years ago. They do work kinda like a restrictor plate. The inspectors had a guage they put down into the carb to make sure they were the correct size.
 
I would rather see a set screw than J-B Weld or epoxy, the additives in gasoline and ethanol and epoxies in particular don't play together too well in the long term.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't go for that
We didn't have a choice at some tracks we had to run them. I didn't like them either but that was the rule, stupid as it was. They had to be epoxied in too so I had different carbs for different tracks. I never had a problem with them coming out. Once they were glued on that was it. They were never coming back off.
 
I'm skeptical. Carburetor design is a real science. What they are screwing with there is a significant area of design. Holley already markets a smaller "spread bore" design, I'd go for something like that before playing with this stuff
 
I'm skeptical. Carburetor design is a real science. What they are screwing with there is a significant area of design. Holley already markets a smaller "spread bore" design, I'd go for something like that before playing with this stuff

I also don’t like the squared off style on the top. They could have at least beveled the top edge. Yeah……it’s interesting……but I don’t think so. Lol
 
I find these kinds interesting, but wonder if they will really change flow, or of they just disrupt everything? These would be good for slant six people wanting to convert a 600 to a smaller carburetor. IF they really work.

CARTER EDELBROCK AFB 600 to 500 CFM CARB RESTRICTORS PRIMARY SIDE | eBay

When I was running a slant six, I used a 390 Holley vac secondary, (same carb we’re running on Jason’s 318 now).

It worked very very well with a header and a mild cam.

I also ran a 450 mech secondary and a 650 vacuum secondary on the “hotter” six I had.

The 650 fed it better, but the 390 was a WAY better compromise on the street.
 
I would rather see a set screw than J-B Weld or epoxy, the additives in gasoline and ethanol and epoxies in particular don't play together too well in the long term.
where are the going to go? They rest on the booster. set screw could ingest. How about an interference fit.

BG uses the same approach to alter the King Demon CFM, although a little more refined....
0607phr_01_z-king_demon_carburetor-.jpg
 
Last edited:
I had a spare Edelbrock 1406 lying around, so I tried these restrictors on a 289 once and hooked up my wideband. The Mixture was WAY rich, even after I leaned it down quite a bit. They might eventually work with a lot of messing around, but I believe (it's been several years) I started with a base tune for an Edelbrock 1403, which is a 500 cfm carb, and it wasn't even close. I believe I just swapped back to the normal venturi cluster.

Of course, there's always the chance I screwed something up. In fact, if I recall, one of the restrictors went on a touch cockeyed for whatever reason, probably not enough to make a difference. I don't know if it was an operator (me) or machining error, but I remember that the epoxy set up before I could do anything about it. And I think that's the danger...it's pretty easy to ruin a primary venturi cluster if you don't like the result, so plan accordingly. As always, your results may vary, as I'm a professional English teacher and amateur mechanic (who does, to be fair, do almost all his own repairs).

I'm running an actual 1403 on the car now, and I don't think there's much of a difference in throttle response between a 1403 and a 1406, for what it's worth.
 
-
Back
Top