340 x-block vs. 410 stroker ?

Here is the way I see it and I may be wrong I'm far from a racer or engine builder im just a car guy who likes old cars. But to get to 410 you start with a 360. A 340 stock for stock will make more power (depending on the year) I know for a fact a stock 360 is nothing to to write home about because of the big dished pistons and smog heads and less then stellar 2bbl carb and small cam.
Now take that 360 put flattop a 4bbl and a little cam your right with the stock 340. Then adding more cubes by stroking it gives it an advantage. Not to mention a higher rpm limit. So just assuming that everything else is equal ie heads,carb,cam, scr, the stroker has the advantage simply because of cubic inches and a higher rpm. Now throw on a set of dual quads we have our winner. ;) well in theory we will never know cause this thread is two years old and the race has never happened lol. Hint hint Haha
.
Technically speaking if you take a 360 and put the same compression ratio pistons in it that the 340 has Bolt the 340 heads on the 360 along with the manifold and carburetor and the camshaft and the 360 will whip but on the 340. 20 cubes is 20 cubes.

Now stroke the 360 to 410. You no longer have the balance set up that you had with the earlier 3:40 or 360. You now need more airflow to fill that 410 in.
So you take a 340 that is set up and a 410 that is halfway setup and the 340 is going to win. We already know that a 340 low compression small valve motor runs 1070's in a stocker.