Trick flow 270s or 240s on a 383?

PRH said
TF heads, as nice as they are, probably wouldn’t be my choice for a 383 with a mid-sized cam a two speed trans.
But $$ per cfm, they’re a bargain and hard to ignore.
I hope you do it, since I wouldn’t....... and I’d like to see how it turns out.

I can do my own head work, so my view on what to use is different than someone who is paying to have work done.

I’m not sure the trw 383 dome will clear the TF chamber without some trimming(it might, it might not).

Also, it’s very rare that a home ported 906 would flow 280.
Typically more like 240-260, with flow dropping off above .500-ish.

This is another one of those things that would make for an interesting test.
Ported 906’s vs TF240 vs TF270 vs ?? .........On a stock stoke 383.

I like your thinking on the TF 240 vs 383, as in...just as curious how it works out.
As for the 906... it's a decent head and when ported by someone familiar with these heads...280 cfm with a stock 2.08 by .500 lift is very real. Last set I flowed 1st reman since factory peaked @228 cfm.
Like a slant head there isn't much in the roof, the real gains are all in the ssr n floor.

OP, I vote for the 240 version.