Mopars that are so ugly they hurt you eyes!

-
These models are pretty ugly too :popcorn:

93738F69-6041-409D-89CA-253B6A6C1FA3.jpeg


0FA173F7-832D-47AC-8E8B-F7B7C75CD24C.jpeg


115439C4-2836-488B-AE38-B31EB462B889.jpeg


96FDE0B8-60C6-42E6-A509-DBD36EA4377B.jpeg


0A637F4A-5B7D-446B-9013-3857732DF76F.jpeg


DCF96B9F-5064-41E1-9F93-3CF52307CB35.jpeg


9C090CA5-78DF-43FA-8336-84F90DBEBDB8.jpeg
 
Hang-on; what if you had never seen a shark-tooth grill?
I mean it is kindof Challerger-esque
If I’d never seen a shark tooth grill I’d still prefer the stock grill over the RTS front end. That said, I do like their idea of using the 67-69 Cuda bumper. I, and a few other members, have considered doing that and building a custom lower valance
 
My favorite is the one that takes me everywhere I want to go, and doesn't break down.
My least favorites are beakers with tall fat front tires on Keystones, and sitting at or near factory rideheight.
I used to back my beaker (s) into the parking stall so I couldn't see the front when I went out in the morning. I just couldn't drink enough coffee........ Had I known then what I know now; my 74 DartSport wouldda been wearing a 73 Duster front or a 71 Demon, both of which I had at the time. And then I wouldn't have had to sell it; I just couldn't take the ugly, not one more day.
 
I'd love one of those m-body wagons. Fill in that back side window, smooth out those back doors, and make it look nomad-ish. 360 magnum with a 4 speed and 4.10 screws. Cherry red with a pizza delivery logo on the filled in back windows, with some cragars and fat meats on it.
 
Can someone explain to me, or point me somewhere what TOAD means? I've seen it here before, and googled it which wasn't much help.
"Toad" refers to a 1960 to 1962 Valiant or 1961 to 1962 Lancers. An unfortunate name for a pretty good car. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And everyone has an opinion. I don't use the term myself!
IMG_8417.JPG
 
"Toad" refers to a 1960 to 1962 Valiant or 1961 to 1962 Lancers. An unfortunate name for a pretty good car. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And everyone has an opinion. I don't use the term myself!
View attachment 1715349685
Any info on how the moniker 'TOAD' go to refer to those? Personally, I like those cars.. unique.
 
The "K" cars were definitively the worst in both styling and performance.
I'm sure what's worse, this car or the fact that someone tried to improve it.
kwag4.jpg
 
From the side they totally look like toads with long noses,and complete with crouching legs
and from the 3/4 rear also
It's actually TOADF; Totally Odd And Downright Fuggly

They are growing on me too.
 
That thing is super cool, Look at the trim, that would be cool with a Hemi and modern running gear. IMO
 
I like the Coronet/ Super Bee grills, but they botched the hood transition IMO. I know they had to clear the radiator, but it seems they could have done something other than take a lazy way out.
 
I like the Coronet/ Super Bee grills, but they botched the hood transition IMO. I know they had to clear the radiator, but it seems they could have done something other than take a lazy way out.

I forgot the older dodge pick ups that had the humongous headlight buckets, thet were butt ugly too. My ex step dad had one ---
 
-
Back
Top