67 Cuda: disappointing dyno numbers, need some advice!

I don't recognize the number of that cam what are the specs
If you go roller rockers you need B3's kit factor that in I also do not see a gain with 1.5 maybe some with 1.6 on the intake
IDK about a 8 degree in/ex split with the late heads and headers
the new cam has a lot more lift so check the keeper to stem seal clearance
did you describe your exhaust? any restrictions will bleed off the top end
308s a great head for the HP you have may take major work to get to 400HP

the purple cam is the old grind .450/455 268/272 , I thought with the stamped rockers I may not even be getting a full 1.5 ratio and not seeing all of current cam. My exhaust is TTI 3/4 step headers into 3" TTI X pipe into dual 3" all the way out.

It’s not going to be all that easy to find another 50-70 rwhp....... and you have to decide how much of that nice driveability and low end grunt you’re willing to give up to get more up top.

For “mid-300’s” at the wheels...... you’re talking about a 400hp at the crank combo.

If that’s really the goal, then I agree with pulling a head to verify the compression and overall hp potential of the heads.

If you don’t want to dig that deep into it....... cam swap, retest..... see where you’re at.

Which m1 manifold are you using now?
If it’s the aluminum dual plane that looks about like a 68-70 340 intake, I’d step up to an RPM A/G.

it is indeed the aluminum m1 dual plane. I'm starting to see a general consensus that my heads may be sub par, though I have heard that the 308's flow better than x, j heads. The engine was built by Barnes and Reece in NC. which I have heard is a reputable builder, however they may have just put the engine together how they were asked and may or may not of ported them.