I am really surprised this didn't kick up

RustyRatRod said
I want to make myself clear on something though. Tony is a wealth of knowledge and information on these cars. He has more experience in his left pinky than most people gain in a lifetime. I have the utmost respect for him and his abilities. Just because I disagree with him on something takes nothing away from him at all. I just disagree.

Also.........MILLIONS of Mopars drove MILLIONS of miles and never got frame connectors. Lots are still out there and they are fine. Everything I have said about the subject is MY PERSONAL OPINION and should be taken as such. Seems lots of people here agree. Some don't and that's fine too. I guess the bottom line is do to your car what YOU want to. If frame connectors ain't it, then more power to you!

How many of those miles were logged in bone stock vehicles running bias ply’s, just as the factory intended?

No one here is arguing that these cars will fall apart or are dangerous without subframe connectors. They’re beneficial, not absolutely mandatory.

Tony, on the other hand, is advocating that you should cut out subframe connectors if your car already has them, they’re that bad. He is out of his depth.

RustyRatRod said
I wonder if maybe he's talking about metal fatigue from the flex. Since the spot welds are already harder....and they are.......good point........maybe he means they get metal fatigue from having to carry more load from the added connectors? I know......I'm reaching here but that's all I can think of.

He’s just wrong Rob. I don’t know what he’s thinking or what his motivations are. But he’s completely *** backwards on this.

retroron said
The post isn't about disrespecting Tony, its identifying his information for what it is. With no disrespect, it's BS, it's from a person talking beyond his knowledge base, let's be honest.

Exactly. I’m sure Tony is a wealth of knowledge on other topics. But on this one, he’s completely off base. It’s not an attack on him, he’s just wrong.