383 magnum versus 383 big block

-
D Dyno doesn't have much for specifics there. I would have to look up all the specs and build a head to mimic the Edelbrocks. I just used "2 valve,open chamber, wedge,low performance,stock ports"
on my desktop dyno, they have an option for "aluminum aftermarket head" select it, and the flow numbers are close to the eddy heads he mentioned. You can adjust based off the advertised flow from eddy if you want.
 
on my desktop dyno, they have an option for "aluminum aftermarket head" select it, and the flow numbers are close to the eddy heads he mentioned. You can adjust based off the advertised flow from eddy if you want.
I have Desktop Dyno 5. I don't see that option.
 
I have Desktop Dyno 5. I don't see that option.
hmmm thats just a newer version of mine, I'm on 3. is there a little valve looking button thing near the drop down menu for the heads?
 
hmmm thats just a newer version of mine, I'm on 3. is there a little valve looking button thing near the drop down menu for the heads?
Nope

Capture.PNG
 
The beauty of the magnum is factory roller lifters and the ability to use a factory O/D transmission
As for the trans you can bolt that onto any SBM
As for roller lifters, that is a benefit.
As for a roller cam, at your stated useage, I doubt the Magnum is much if any advantage. The clearance ramps on hydraulic roller cams are very long and very slow... sometimes nearly three cam sizes greater from advertised to .050,never mind to fully closed.This allows a lot of cylinder pressure at low rpm, to escape back up into the intake. And for a streeter, the vast majority of it's time is spent where? Riiight, at low rpm. And that blows the efficiency angle right outta the water. So, IMO you'd be better off with a fast-rate FTH cam and best would be a solid lifter, narrower than 112 LSA. The point being; In this case I see very little advantage to a Magnum.
Also;it is impossible to build a 318 to 383 with a 4 " stroke;even at 3.91 bore, it comes to 384.25. And can you even find a Magnum with round bores at 3.91 bore? IDK .....
By the time you clean up the cylinders to round and straight, at .020, the cubes have climbed to 388. You'll be in the same pickle as the later 396 Chevelles.... which were actually 402s , as if it made a difference,lol.
 
To answer a few questions I had $1,000 and a lot of time invested in my ported 452's so I would probably do a budget aftermarket head on either build. I have a 500 stroker in the cuda so I am not shy about using a big block. To be honest I have been thinking about more of a cruiser than a race car lately. Something I could drive 8 hours to Carlisle. One of my dream cars is a 66 or 67 Charger. The 383 thing is to be able to run the 383 four barrel badges (I know that is my warped mind). I realize that as soon as you bore either engine they are bigger than that. Thanks for all your responses.
 
Also I run a hydraulic roller in the 500 now. I've had it with flat tappet cams after one ruined my 400. What cam would you use in the magnum stroker?
 
Also I run a hydraulic roller in the 500 now. I've had it with flat tappet cams after one ruined my 400. What cam would you use in the magnum stroker?
Best thing to do is talk to the cam grinder. Way too many choices to choose from here.
 
383, depending on the head castings, should have a 2.08 and at minimum a 1.74 exhaust, except for the early heads which were a 1.60 exhaust.
I went back in and changed the valve sizes. That made a difference. The 383 comes out on top now. It's still a very inaccurate comparison on my part.
 
I went back in and changed the valve sizes. That made a difference. The 383 comes out on top now. It's still a very inaccurate comparison on my part.
Whats a roller cam do in that big block 383?
 
Are these calculations taking into account the better exhaust path that's possible with the small block? Last I knew, those manifolds or headers on the big block A body cars will be compromised to clear the steering, torsion bars, etc.

It doesn't show up in the dyno numbers, but overall a LA small block will have roughly 75 less pounds to haul around than a low deck big block!

This is the very first thing that came to my mind...if the difference is only 75lbs, it's not as big of a deal as I was thinking but this is significant...worth almost a tenth in the quarter mile.

I realize that the OP mentioned that this was already a heavy car (running AC to boot) but weight and weight distribution are significant factors in how the car is going to drive.

I love big blocks as much as the next guy but I'd lean toward saving some trouble and sticking with the small block. Add in aluminum manifold, heads, water pump, some light pullies, electric fans, and you'd be way lighter than an iron head big block and you would be on your way to a better driving experience, IMO.
 
Also I run a hydraulic roller in the 500 now. I've had it with flat tappet cams after one ruined my 400. What cam would you use in the magnum stroker?
If you wanna go off the shelf I'd do like 108 lsa for that hot boy chop and 7000 degrees of duration and 3 inches of lift. Just messin with ya. Definitely keep the duration up and the lsa down though
 
Might have found a deal on an early forged crank 400, just like the one in my car was before I stroked it. If so I may build a stock stroke engine with performance and economy in mind.
 
-
Back
Top