Slightly disappointed in performance

DSMRossi said

What kind of power would you guys expect to the wheels with this setup?

The car is quick, but I though it would be faster. Timing is dead nuts, afr’s are on the rich side at 12:1 at the top.

I have a 360 .030 over
Zero decked the block with KB flat tops
CR at 10.5:1
Imm EQ worked magnum heads 1.6rr
2.02 1.88
Dual plane Eddy intake
Electronic distributor
3:91’s
PTC converter custom spec’d For my setup, great converter, flashes to 3900.
Lunati Voodoo cam specs as follows
Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 262/268; Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 220/226; Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .475/.494; LSA/ICL: 112/108; Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd;

Click to expand...

Just for comparison;
Back in about 2002, my 360 equipped 68 Barracuda went [email protected] with 3.55s and street tires at 3650 pounds and ~715ft elevation. One run only, then went home. Hyup the 750DP was quite rich, didn't care. My 360 was also close to zero-deck with KB 107s, OOTB aluminum Eddies, AG-intake ,TTIs (full exhaust), 10.9Scr,and a 223/230/110 Hughes-cam, with .538/.549lift. The 60ft was in the 2.4zone. Oh yeah this is a clutch car and the tires were 245/[email protected] tall. So 106 was 6900 in third,about same as 1-2 and 2-3 shifts.
IIRC the Wallace calculator makes that 335 hp. I was disappointed in the number, but not at all with the trapspeed.Nor with the engine in general, great streeter.
This combo, IMO, had phenomenal torque and power. If the cam hadn't lost lobes, I'd still be driving it today.