Need advice and also a warning.

Well, it's been quite a while since my first year of law school, but the elements of a legally binding contract are offer, acceptance, consideration, and a meeting of the minds (aka mutuality of obligation). Here, a contract was formed when the seller offered to sell a car for $8500 and the buyer accepted that offer and tendered payment in the amount of $8500. However, the seller is currently in breach of his duty under the contract to deliver the car to the buyer. That would be the basis for OP's suit and his damages.

But the real point here is, the OP just wants his car and parts back. A small claims suit would be mostly to get the seller's attention. Some 90% of such suits are settled before they ever get to court, either by the parties directly, or court-sponsored mediation.

I also have the BOS that states he is the legal owner and there are no liens on the car. That was a lie and that's why it took over a year for him to send me the title. And maybe why the VIN was changed. The VIN for the title I received is different from the one that was on the original BOS. I now have two different BOS both for a challenger and different VIN. One does match the title.

At this point, I'd take all of my money back and moeny for the parts he still has or get the parts back from him.