340 camshaft
FWIW lets see then...
Snipped from a 2007 catalog pdf Jegs has on-line.
voodoo
Seems they are not the same.
And in that older catalog there is a lobe list.
For the Voodoo lobes
and
seems like someone's calulator died or their cut and paste skills failed..oops.
And for comparison with 2019 on-line catalog and cam web pages its easier to type into a spreadsheet.
That explains the two different durations. The 262/268 for the Chrysler is almost certainly a typing error or a marketing decision.
The evidence is there that the lobe is designed for the lifter.
Now we can discuss whether its idealized for the rod - stroke ratio.
Just kidding!
That belongs in a different thread....
FWIW lets see then...
Snipped from a 2007 catalog pdf Jegs has on-line.
voodoo
Seems they are not the same.
And in that older catalog there is a lobe list.
For the Voodoo lobes
and
seems like someone's calulator died or their cut and paste skills failed..oops.
And for comparison with 2019 on-line catalog and cam web pages its easier to type into a spreadsheet.
That explains the two different durations. The 262/268 for the Chrysler is almost certainly a typing error or a marketing decision.
The evidence is there that the lobe is designed for the lifter.
Now we can discuss whether its idealized for the rod - stroke ratio.
Just kidding!
That belongs in a different thread....
