Cam & engine gurus gtf in her meow!

Exactly big little cam set it up like a pro
me? id use dual springs and break in on the outer and use lifters with flats on the sides
I just posted this in another thread but it fits here to
from the archives talking about the similar Lunati
  1. Harold designed both the comp xe line and the MOPAR Lunati Voodoo line
    here's what he says
    "The Mopar VooDoos are true Chrysler profiles, designed for the .904" tappets. "
    "That 213/.454" profile is about 5 or 6 degrees fatter at .200 than the Chevrolet one."

    my comment -5 or 6 degrees at 200 is huge- you can feel it
    The comp xe lobes were designed by Harold after General Kenetics and before Ultradyne and the Lunati Voodoo Mopar hydraulic lobes after Ultradyne
    anyone think that Harold did not learn anything over the years? The Lunati lobes are more modern than the xe lobes- which are much more modern than the H (270h) lobes
    Simple as that
    from another thread Harold gives more on the "213/454 profile he mentions above
    "60400 250/256@ seat 208/[email protected] .454"/.454" valve lift, 112 LSA
    60401 256/262 213/220 .454'/.475" 112 LSA."

    "The 60401 makes about 19" of vacuum in a 360, so you should have plenty in a 408."
    UDHarold"

    Stan Weiss adds FYI
    " for a flat tappet max velocity is around

    .842" - 0.00717 inch / deg

    .875" - 0.00746 inch / deg

    .904" - 0.00771 inch / deg"

    Stan

    i mentioned somewhere that both the Lunati and the Howards close the intake at around the same place as the Lunati is 250 on a 112 lca and the howard is 256 on a 110
  2. so know the tradeoffs and make a choice