Nuclear versus coal

67Dart273 said
Just because "your" reactors have never suffered a dangerous failure, is no reason to assume "they wont" And there aren't all that many. Part of my point, which you ignored, is "what if" the world had many many many many many...............more of them around the world? Somewhere, some place, and earthquake, terrorism, fire, flood, whatever, "something" WILL happen.

Nothing is fool proof but the Can-do Reactors are the safest but more expensive and that's probably why countries take the cheaper route. Nuclear costs 3 cents a kwh, solar costs 6 cents a kwh and windmills cost 8.5 cents a kwh. Has anyone looked at a field full of windmills and said "Oh aren't they lovely"?