Distributor springs

-

canyncarvr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
242
Reaction score
85
Location
State of Jefferson
I have a Mopar distributor that uses Mallory's YT advance. The Mallory spring kit comes with springs ranging from pink **edit to change from lb. to oz. Pounds is wrong** (6oz.) to orange (13oz.) Mallory's timing curves show that two orange springs (the heaviest) will max out at 2500rpm with a 20º limit in the distributor.

The weights are my numbers, measured via scale with the springs at 3/4".

I want to raise that rpm, getting 18º at 32-3400rpm.

Other brands of springs should work, but it would be helpful to know what the options are.

Does anyone know the pull/tension of other brands of springs? MSD maybe? I can double a spring, but I'd rather not. I can reduce the weight value, but I'd rather not fuss with that either. I am looking for the simplest approach, and a 'correct' (for my intended use) spring is exactly that. Springs in the upper teen range would be great...if I can get them.

For $20-some, I can order an MSD kit and see what's in it. If someone can tell me, I won't have to waste the coin.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
It's not the limit that's the problem, it's the governing (restriction) getting TO the limit that's the problem.

My distributor has adjustable stops to limit the maximum advance that can be had. Springs don't limit total advance. I have the distributor set to 20º now, but it gets there too fast. It's 'all in' well under 3krpm now.

Not to be pedantic about it. I'm sure you know all that already. That you asked about an advance limiter when I'm asking about springs means something got missed.
 
are you trying to solve a problem ? that seems like a slow long curve for a mopar unless its under boost.
 
Try this. Summit Racing® YH and YT Series Advance Curve Kits SUM-850535-1

It's Summit's version of advance springs and advance sticks for the YT series distributors with slightly different advance curves than the Mallory kit that has been discontinued.

If you click on the Instructions just below the overview tab you can download a PDF with the advance curves their springs in the kit will get you.

I used it on my Mopar Performance distributor and it worked great.
 
I have a Mopar distributor that uses Mallory's YT advance. The Mallory spring kit comes with springs ranging from pink (6lb.) to orange (13lb.) Mallory's timing curves show that two orange springs (the heaviest) will max out at 2500rpm with a 20º limit in the distributor.

The weights are my numbers, measured via scale with the springs at 3/4".

I want to raise that rpm, getting 18º at 32-3400rpm.

Other brands of springs should work, but it would be helpful to know what the options are.

Does anyone know the pull/tension of other brands of springs? MSD maybe? I can double a spring, but I'd rather not. I can reduce the weight value, but I'd rather not fuss with that either. I am looking for the simplest approach, and a 'correct' (for my intended use) spring is exactly that. Springs in the upper teen range would be great...if I can get them.

Thanks for posting the spring force at 0.75"
The MP version of the kit had spring rates posted on the back cover.
I compared by measuring the diameter of the wire, the coils and counting coils to calculate rates. Most were close.

I'll look at my spreadsheet after dinner and see if any other springs, such as the Crane kit for GM points is in the same range.
The YT, YH advance is a PIA design to do what you want. I was trying for something similar and was moderately succesful using heavier springs and bending loops and/or spring pivots.

It came up a few times in this thread with some pictures of springs and weights (skim through you'll see a little on page 1, then bottom page 2 into 3).
Too much advance at light throttle?

and a discussion about modifying the weights in this thread.
Modifying YH Advance Weights
Which I haven't got around to trrying myself yet.
 
are you trying to solve a problem ? that seems like a slow long curve for a mopar unless its under boost.

Yes. That is a separate thread. I'm looking for different springs to have them on-hand before I take my distributor apart. I have the Mallory YT set but, as noted, their heaviest springs are not spec'd (via Mallory's graph and setup instructions) to get to the curve I'm after.

The other thread:
Old hat...
 
Pink is around 1.1 to 1.7 lbs/in. and the shortest at .56"
Orange from mallory worked out to 13.3 lbs/in but the one in MP kit was 8 lb/in by my calculation and 6.5 lb/in according to them. It was also the longest of the primary springs a 0.635"
The long looped silver springs are around 28 - 30 lb/in and at .815" slightly longer than the long looped purple, which has slightly lower spring rate.

The springs in the Crane Kit for GM points distributers are around .6" and vary in spring rate from around 11 lbs/in to 24 lbs/in
Gardner spring available from hardware stores is also around 24 lbs/in rate but its .75" long. Can also buy it from McMaster as p/n 9044k171

Check the inside diameter needed for the Mallory YT - YH advance to fit on the spring perches.
I'll look through my experiments with the mallory based distributor to see what I did that might be helpful. I know my current setup is a slower advance, but I think less degrees than your planning. It might be using the Crane Blue spring with the silver secondary spring.

MVC-006F.JPG


Springs-260F-Macmster.jpg
 
I want to raise that rpm, getting 18º at 32-3400rpm.
Right. Same challenge many of us have had; The advance adjustment cuts off the top of the curve, and worse, it also reduces initial the preload.

Reading the graph, we think that reducing the advance to 18* will result in something like sketched here:
upload_2018-11-23_21-5-16.png


But what actually happens is it starts advancing earlier and ends up more like this:
(using orange and purple springs for example.)
upload_2018-11-23_21-10-34.png

Preload can be regained by bending the spring perches out.. But we want to limit the number of times we bend them back and forth!

*PS. Ignore that "factory standard v8" nonsense. No such thing I've seen.
 
Last edited:
That is exactly the sort of information I'm looking for, The .75" are a tad long, but would work as a second stage of a two stage curve. The Crane kit at .6" and 11-24lb/in sound good. You having mentioned them, I presume the diameter/loops fit the YT advance?

I see Crane kits at Summit that include a diaphragm. Kind'a spendy for just springs. Do you have a kit number that has the springs you mention?

An aside: This BS about listing diaphragm kits that say nothing about the advance they provide, let alone at what vacuum seems ridiculous to me. I asked Summit about the advance specs on their advertised cans. They said they didn't have that information. It's all application driven..made for a particular model/make/year. The specs of the kits? They have no clue.

How about a Mr. Gasket 928G spring set? I forget if urls can be put in threads:
https://www.jegs.com/i/Mr.-Gasket/7...MIvfSHi_zr3gIVbx6tBh1wfAlHEAQYAyABEgKybPD_BwE
 
Preload can be regained by bending the spring perches out.. But we want to limit the number of times we bend them back and forth!

Yep!

I'd prefer to not be bending things to make-do...which is why an assortment of higher rated springs than the Mallory kit provides seems to be a good plan.

Thanks for the link to the weight surgery. I was contemplating drilling holes in the weights. Considering the physics of the motion and removing weight from the 'outside' of the movement had not occurred to me. That's great!!
 
I was thinking holes too. Seemed like a good way to be fairly consistant with the amount removed from each.
I didnt want to touch that distributor while still experimenting with the Chrysler made ones. It may not be perfect but its a decent working backup that can be popped in while experimenting on the others..

How about a Mr. Gasket 928G spring set? I forget if urls can be put in threads:
https://www.jegs.com/i/Mr.-Gasket/7...MIvfSHi_zr3gIVbx6tBh1wfAlHEAQYAyABEgKybPD_BwE

I don't know. They look different. lemme see if I have info on the Crane kit. Yea. Looks like they were in the package with a vacuum advance pod too. Crane 99601-1 I used that for another project, as were the springs.

Spring rate + the perch spread will determine the preload. That's what I call force of the primary spring(s) when its not spinning. That's a work around that will probably be needed. I also tweaked the spring lengths by bending the end loops. Not easy but doable.
My final setup was and is the Crane Blue and the MP Green Spring, both with the perches and loops tweaked. Without that, the green was much too long to be effective with only 18* advance in the distributor. 0.831" long inside the loops compared to purple which measured .795"

Here's some of the timing measurements plotted out. All of these were done on the car, mostly with an Innova digital dialback light. Take it for what it is, ballpark comparisons. I don't fully trust the dialback light at higher rpms or the MSD.

upload_2018-11-23_22-14-10.png
 
I don't want to blend the two threads I started on the basic question, but the 18º in the distributor isn't a done deal, yet. I have 20º now, and that is either too much or too fast. I haven't sorted that out yet. I'm getting some ducks in somewhat of a row before I start with another recurve project. I may end up with 20º, I may end up with a 14º initial, probably less. I'll end up with whatever I end up with.

Thank you for the Crane kit number. If I have to spend $40 on a couple of springs, I will.

I appreciate your help.
 
I just recurved mine as well ..looking for 2* adavance per 1000 rpm with 34 total by 3500. I had a variety of springs from past dizzy's. I think I am pretty close to what I wanted.
I am also experimenting with using ported vs non-ported vacuum and adjusting my intitial setting.
Its time consuming but fun !
 
I just recurved mine as well ..looking for 2* adavance per 1000 rpm with 34 total by 3500.
That is the starting point I'm going for.

With that (34º @ 3400rpm), where does your initial end up? ..with an idle rpm of what?

Yes, every engine is different and takes what it takes. Just curious. Having started with a '73 engine in my car and an stock initial timing nowhere close to reasonable or effective, I'm surprised to find how much initial advance a 340 likes.

I had a variety of springs from past dizzy's. I think I am pretty close to what I wanted.
I am also experimenting with using ported vs non-ported vacuum and adjusting my intitial setting.
Its time consuming but fun !

Great! Come do mine!
 
I mispoke on the 2* per 1000 rpm... The initial comes in faster then it slows as you get bigger in the rpms. all in around 4000.
I am still experimenting but the car seems to drive smoother.

Im running EQ Magnum heads with a tight quench and hyd roller so my engine might only need a total of 32 + 17ish of vacuum avdance.

Halifax could set your curve in a jiffy if you dont want to jack around with it.
 
Yes, every engine is different and takes what it takes. Just curious. Having started with a '73 engine in my car and an stock initial timing nowhere close to reasonable or effective, I'm surprised to find how much initial advance a 340 likes.
Do you have the stock advance info from the '73 service manual? Just curious about what they were doing, that's all.
The early smog stuff focused on reducing CO and HC. Idle air fuel mixtures were leaned out to 14.2 and initial timing as well as engine deceleration timing was reduced. This makes no sense in terms of efficiency (less timing advance with leaner mixture) but put more heat into the cylinders and exhaust ensuring the burn of excess HC. By '73 NOx was also being addressed so not sure what that might have looked like in terms of timing curve.
upload_2018-11-24_14-24-3.png

For best efficiency, assuming no smog equipment other than PCV, the timing curves from '66-7 are good starting points. Of course there was no 340 in '67, so that means we have to look at the '68 timing with the understanding that timing at idle was less advanced to meet the emissions goals of that year.
Here's the Plymouth timing curve for '68 340
upload_2018-11-24_14-33-3.png

One thing to watch out for when experimenting with initial timing. In neutral an engine will run lean, with lots of advance, and love it, because its only overcoming internal friction. As soon as its slipped into gear, its got no power, loses rpm and wants to die. I'd target experimenting in the range of 10 - 15* initial for a stock 340, with advance begining between 600 and 700 rpm. Keep in mind this timing at idle pairs a bit richer mixture for best power efficiency. if you access to a CO meter or WBO2, something between 12.9 and 13.9 once warmed up is probably where it will end up.

Taking that and using the '67 273 4bbl timing for some guidance, move the initial to 10* BTDC. Then looking at some general performance target for high rpm WOT timing, 32 to 36* is probably the range for that. Shifting the stock timing to accomplish that and the result is the dashed blue timing curve.
upload_2018-11-24_14-49-39.png
 
Last edited:
but the 18º in the distributor isn't a done deal, yet. I have 20º now, and that is either too much or too fast. I haven't sorted that out yet.
Its hard but it seems like your sorting it out the right way. In my case I had a pretty good idea from the dyno and drag strip of the acceptable high rpm timing. I assume you have that or are going by the MP guidelines of 35*. Mine was pinging at part throttle, moderate and even light loads once the engine was heat soaked from several hours of highway driving. I tried reducing how quickly vacuum advance came in but that it didnt fully address the problem. That's how I narrowed it down to being too much mechanical advance betwen 2000 and 2800 rpm rather than too much total or too much vacuum advance.
 
Here's the Plymouth timing curve for '68 340
Taking that and using the '67 273 4bbl timing for some guidance, move the initial to 10* BTDC. Then looking at some general performance target for high rpm WOT timing, 32 to 36* is probably the range for that. Shifting the stock timing to accomplish that and the result is the dashed blue timing curve.
View attachment 1715253058

This looks pretty promising for canyncarvr
 
Yes, this is an old thread. A final result is better posted here (sez me) that an isolated new post, so here are some facts for y'all.

I was looking for re-curve information to hopefully resolve a bit of rattle (detonation) I've had for years. It happens right around a best-fill cylinder time..just over 3K rpm. I have reduced timing to lessen the noise, but it is sometimes still there if I don't run 'clear' (no ethanol) 92 fuel.

The problem is now gone, although several things happened at the same time so I cannot tell which did what.

1. My brake booster failed. I have not had good brakes for years, have always considered it a cam issue as it started with the install of a Direct Connection 292º purple shaft cam. I simply got used to brake fade after two pedal strokes. A rebuilt booster (all that in another thread) resolved that problem.

Point is, while the booster was still working (I thought), I did NOT think it had anything to do with low manifold vacuum at idle because I had blocked the booster off and NOT seen any change in vacuum readings. I'm not saying the thing has been leaking all these years, but that after it was rebuilt, my 'bit of rattle' at the occurrence of cylinder fill-time went away.

But that wasn't all.

2. My ECU failed at the same time. It was a blue unit from NAPA, supposedly one of their 'better' units I was told. I had been running an MSD-6C for years, then IT quit some years back. That's how I got to an aftermarket ECU.

Here's a bit of a rub: I have a VDO tach that has been bad for quite awhile. 'Bad' meaning the needle jumps all over the place. I got stranded once when the engine died with no spark, resolved that problem when I disconnected the tach. I found no replacement that suited me, so the tach sat on the column for years.

I went through a couple of
ECU bay-specials, one of them boxed as 'Standard' brand that was dead out of the box. Nothing on the ECU identified it as indeed being a 'Standard' brand. When I finally got an ECU that worked, I was only slightly deliriously happy to find that my VDO worked just fine! Evidently, the earlier ECU clamped the negative signal (minus off coil) to the VDO to the extent the tach could not operate.

I had tested the secondary spark (Big Yellow Accel) with a MAC ignition tester and the newly dead ECU did compare just slightly less output-wise than the ECU I ended up using. A btw, but the working ECU is actually marked as a Standard brand.

I did NOT change anything timing-curve wise in my distributor. I'm still running purple/brown springs, ported vacuum, with an 11º vacuum can. The can vacuum is adjusted close to max 'resistance', not starting 'til around 11in. of vacuum. I specifically do NOT say CW or CCW on the adjustment, because I have seen that direction described BOTH WAYS more than once. I can't say that the references are wrong. Maybe not all cans 'adjust' the same way. I DO know that my direction for 'less' and 'more' is opposite from what I've read more than once. SO...YMMV. I am running 12-33º.

The engine idles well at 800rpm (as suggested by Hughes, whose cam I'm running now). There is no hysteresis or 'looping up' of the idle as I've had for decades. As stated, I could PULL the idle down to 800rpm with the clutch, but the engine didn't want to go there on its own.

I've also had run-on problems when turning the ignition off. That's been a problem for years. I figured it maybe had to with running a four-post idle carb, or some other nefarious gremlin. No amount of secondary plate adjustment seemed to matter. After the booster and ECU replacement, the engine might run on once in awhile...but it's usually too hot at those times.

3. I did away with my cool-can. I've had a large copper coil in my fuel line for decades, the can attached to the radiator support on the right side (passenger) of the engine compartment. I don't generally put ice IN it, so the coil is more of a heater than cooler. During Spring fuel change (formulation is changed here every Spring/Fall) to a 'less volatile' mix, I have been stalled on an unusually warm day with the 'winter mix'..and I can hear the fuel boil in the carb. With no reason for it to be there (no ice in it) it might was well be out of the loop....and so it now is.

Engine runs very well. That is to be expected with the change from 8-28º. I no longer intentionally stay away from mechanical secondary opening. It starts perfectly, runs much cooler, and is just generally a lot more fun to drive.

And there is this, maybe #4: The throttle cable was maybe a tad snug. It seemed to have a bit of play, but it is true that I adjusted it to have MORE play during the whole booster/ECU/timing change fuss.

I am running the OEM choke cam on the Holley 750. I have filed on it a bit..as to get a high idle out it, the high idle screw ends up interfering with the actual idle screw on the other side.

Timing matters, and getting it right might be a problem. What may seem to be the result of what is considered a poor timing curve MIGHT BE something completely different.

It ALL matters! Just get it done right....and be happy!
 
Last edited:
.....................

****. "Old thread" alert...............
 
Found an old points distributor lying around. Small block. No dist. numbers. So, I made a cardboard circle and put lines at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 degrees. Made a hole in the center and slid it on the rotor shaft. Held the bottom of the shaft in a vice, taped the housing so it didn't move, and turned the rotor. It eyeballed to ~20*. The closest I found was the specs from a 1968 318. [Initial = TDC ------ Mechanical = 36*].

Then taped a 1/2'' --- 1/4'' drive socket to the rotor shaft. It took ~ 1 inlb of torque to make the advance weights start to move [1000 engine RPM?]. It took ~ 4 inlb of torque to make the maximum advance [4000 engine RPM?]. ------- By using a degree wheel and an accurate torque wrench [zero to 10 inlbs], It may be possible to set up a distributor without tearing into it so many times. A lot of educated guessing and patience is involved. Plus keeping notes and a lot of different springs.

Just an idea I wanted to get out of my head.
 
Will factory type springs work for ur set up? If so I have about 20 from old dists. I also have a kit P2932675. Also a Mr. Gasket kit. I think 911B or maybe 914B. Kim
 
-
Back
Top