AMD's response to discontinuing some MoPar product

Thanks for posting this.
It answers a lot of questions that some of us were wondering about.

In a way, I don't blame them for discontinuing certain parts that they don't sell a lot of to warrant the space it takes up in a warehouse, labor to produce them, etc.
On the other hand, why not just do shorter runs of the product to keep up with the eventual demands?
Also, I don't buy the fact that discontinuing '70 and '71 Duster/Demon quarter panels is a great idea as well as totally discontinuing the '67 to '69 Barracuda quarters all together is wise.

However, they do have the statistics on what really sells and the volume of product going out the door, not us.
It is a business after all, and they have shareholders to answer to.

We aren't the only ones affected by the discontinuations, the '63 to '65 B-Body guys are hit hard and the '62 to '65 Chev Impala guys are hit hard as well.

I suppose we'll all have to endure, just like we did in the '90s, we had a good run with them making the AMD sheet metal parts available in the first place.
Just think of all the cars that have been saved because of them up to now.........
I've seen this explain before and that's a simple answer they can't do just short runs. Let's just say that a normal run is 100 fenders and they have to sell 60 fenders to just pay for setting up the tooling the labor the metal the boxing them up to getting them over to storage I mean all of the logistics to make it happen. Now let's say they set that all up to do like you said it short run a 40... They've already lost money....