Budget Rocker choice

And, the question was answered. I said geometry, which is the shaft height for a given combination, which varies. But, if you need an example of what 30% is, here you go.

If the shaft needs to be .300" below the perpendicular plane, and it is .400" below, then it is .100" more than .300", so it is 30% in error (technically 33.333333~%).

Now, if the shaft should only be .250" below the perpendicular line, and it was .400" below, then it would be in error 40%. I've had shafts as much as .380" lower than they were supposed to be. How much error is that when the shaft is only supposed to be down .300"? How about 127%. Is that bad?

Quick question from a bonehead - Has any testing been done to actually quantify what that 30% results in, in term of lost duration/lift, hp (verified on a dyno), etc? At what point does valve train geometry that's not perfect actually become something that's noticeable in the real world?