Quench vs. Compression on a daily driver.

My contribution to the mayhem LOL:

For option 3, at .073", conventional thinking is that you really don't have any quench effect any more. Option 2 is some limited quench effect. Option 1 is getting some real effect.

Just a few checks:
  • What pistons?
  • What cam?
And you do know that you can retard the cam and lower your DCR? I would do that and keep to option 1 or 2.

And increase that 5 cc in the pistons to 6 cc to add in the volume down around the top of the pistons down to the top rings.

With that, and 2 degrees of added retard on the cam timing, you are now at 7.9 to 8.0 with option 2.

I've run 8.3 DCR on the highway on 93 premium with quench.... IIRC in the .050" range. I had to limit ignition timing a bit; can't tell you the exact numbers anymore.. that was 40+ years ago LOL.

Thank you for the thoughts!

- Speed Pro H116CP pistons
- Mutha Thumpr, which is at 102 intake centerline, really not sure about retarding it...

I was wondering best option without increasing volume of the pistons or chamber, but I suppose machining the pistons might be the best choice if I had to go that way... ? But, still hoping to just fine the best head gasket option and see how that goes.