Least Shoddy Fuel Sending Unit?

-
So first step is find the nichrome resistor wire with correct per inch resistance the mechanically secure it like factory since solder wont stick to the nichrome. good luck
Bingo! And way back when... I had no idea about nichrome wire and how solder wouldn't stick to it. Thus why I am having this problem again. I've learned a lot since then.
 
Naw. I'll do it my way. That's why we have choices in life. Not one way is always correct. :poke:
 
Bingo! And way back when... I had no idea about nichrome wire and how solder wouldn't stick to it. Thus why I am having this problem again. I've learned a lot since then.
If anyone identifies a source for the nichrome or someone who is rewinding boards, that would be great.

The heart of the problem of the replacements is the board and the float arm length.
See Fuel Sending Units and A-Body Fuel Tank Map

@Cuda Al shows his repair in detail -
Fuel Sender Rebuild

as does this How to article (except he gives up on fixing a board with busted wire - as I did at one time)
OEM Fuel Sender Repair 1967 Dart

In the mid sixties to the early seventies the part number was 2421493. From around 1973 to 1975 or early 1976 the number was changed to 3621515. Then Chrysler changed the number to 4051004. When they went to the newest number, the float was plastic. I recall seeing a Chrysler memo telling why they changed to plastic floats. They said because of brass corrosion caused by small amounts of moisture in the fuel they changed floats to plastic.
Thanks. Good info.
Part numbers I looked up in the FSMs were:
1967 p/n 2257 493
1973 p/n 3621 615

Several changes in fuel formulation in th 70s. One of them may have resulted in greater reaction with brass.
 
Last edited:
I’ve read that the Vans unit’s suck the least. Out of the box they read 77 empty and 8 full, which is on par with the factory specs. I do know that you need to play with them, and accept the fact that you’re better off showing 3/4 full and empty, than full and run out at 1/4 tank.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is what mine is doing now
 
WAY over kill for you and most needed here, but here is a 1/2” sending unit made by RobbMc, he makes quality products.

RobbMc Performance Products - 1/2" Sending Unit

I don’t know if his sender reads accurately or not. I don’t have a stock tank, only a fuel cell, but I would have tried it if I could. Maybe I’ll go with one in my other car.

You might think so , but he doesn`t stand behind his products . Ask him about the rocker arms he used to sell w/ the procomp heads !!
I wouldn`t buy anything from the duschbag !!
 
I’ve also heard that Bill Rolik has the best unit out there. It’s $140, but it’s supposed to actually work as intended.
 
Thread revival POW!
Hey guys, an update. So as it was recommended to me, I ended up purchasing the aftermarket sending unit from AM-Autoparts from ebay.

Fuel Gas Tank Sending Unit w/ 5/16" Line for Dodge Dart Plymouth Duster | eBay

And after running around and fueling the car, I can say that the sending unit is accurate through the whole range of the fuel gauge from full to empty. I never adjusted it either when I got it in the mail, I installed it as it came.

Now, that said... I would like to make an important note. My instrument cluster has had the voltage regulator replaced with a solid state one of my own construction. I'm sure everyone's seen the whole 7805 voltage regulator mod for the instrument cluster. Mopar Voltage Regulator Upgrade


Well, I looked at that mod and wondered why they were using a 5 volt regulator instead of a 6 volt regulator... seeing as it's 6 volt gauges. So I substituted a 7806 in place of the 7805 (last number indicating the voltage).

I wonder if that has anything to do with it? Could that be the solution to these aftermarket sending units? Mine is dead nuts, while tons of others are way off. Did those people do the mod, but with the 7805? Hmm, I say!

On a side note, the original sending unit failed because the float sank.
 
What are your plans for your old sender? Is it OEM?
How did you determine that the ranges were correct?

The voltage of the IVR might effect the full range of the guage but not the accuracy thru the ranges.
 
What are your plans for your old sender? Is it OEM?
How did you determine that the ranges were correct?

The voltage of the IVR might effect the full range of the guage but not the accuracy thru the ranges.
I determined the ranges were correct by knowing the capacity of the tank, and driving it until it reached different parts of the gauge (full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4) and filling it to full again from that point. It always jived with how much I put it to how much it was supposed to read on the gauge, at least within reason for a mopar fuel gauge. My only complaint might be that full is just a bare hair over the full tick mark, by just a tiny bit.

As for the old sender, it is afaik original to the car, or at least the original style. I plan on replacing the sunk float and stashing it for if the after market one fails or if I get another A body.
 
Hey guys!
I find myself seeking advice once again. Just like every A body from the beginning of time, my fuel gauge doesn't work! Yay! This isn't the first time I've had to fix it, but this time I have to get a new sending unit because I can't afford the down time of having my daily driver out of commission while I fix the original mopar sender.

So... what's the best aftermarket sending unit? I know they all suck, but which one sucks the least? I tried doing a search, but every single post went into how they suck without going into detail on specific sending units and which ones might be at least tolerable for a little while.

I only intend to have the thing installed for a week or two while I fix my original one. I even know exactly what the problem is without even having the unit out. It's that violin shaped phenolic board with the resistor windings all around it. I know my gauge is good, and I've already done the solid state mod for the voltage regulator on the instrument cluster.

Thanks!

Bought one from Van's in Wisconsin on Ebay.

I knew the float level for the gauge was goin to be off, so I took the time to rebend the float arm so it would read the proper level on the gauge in the dash. Then permanently installed it.

Worked Fine
 
I had an original fuel sender with brass float. Over time float cracked and sunk in fuel. Back then oredered one from my local dealer. (Still available then.) It came eith a plastic float! At 1st I was like why did chrysler sell me taiwanese junk! However, float has been working great ever since!
 
Thread revival POW!
Hey guys, an update. So as it was recommended to me, I ended up purchasing the aftermarket sending unit from AM-Autoparts from ebay.

Fuel Gas Tank Sending Unit w/ 5/16" Line for Dodge Dart Plymouth Duster | eBay

And after running around and fueling the car, I can say that the sending unit is accurate through the whole range of the fuel gauge from full to empty. I never adjusted it either when I got it in the mail, I installed it as it came.

Now, that said... I would like to make an important note. My instrument cluster has had the voltage regulator replaced with a solid state one of my own construction. I'm sure everyone's seen the whole 7805 voltage regulator mod for the instrument cluster. Mopar Voltage Regulator Upgrade


Well, I looked at that mod and wondered why they were using a 5 volt regulator instead of a 6 volt regulator... seeing as it's 6 volt gauges. So I substituted a 7806 in place of the 7805 (last number indicating the voltage).

I wonder if that has anything to do with it? Could that be the solution to these aftermarket sending units? Mine is dead nuts, while tons of others are way off. Did those people do the mod, but with the 7805? Hmm, I say!

On a side note, the original sending unit failed because the float sank.
The 7805 regulators that I used to build the demon IVR would start cold at about 4.9V but as it warmed up output would climb as high as 5.4V .
 
The 7805 regulators that I used to build the demon IVR would start cold at about 4.9V but as it warmed up output would climb as high as 5.4V .
Oh? In the electronics world, that would be considered out of tolerance and would be pitched in the garbage. You might consider replacing it.
My 7806 regulators would start at exactly 6 volts and would heat up and be at 6 volts. I bench tested it under load for about a week before installing in my car. Then I made a spare just in case.
 
Oh? In the electronics world, that would be considered out of tolerance and would be pitched in the garbage. You might consider replacing it.
My 7806 regulators would start at exactly 6 volts and would heat up and be at 6 volts. I bench tested it under load for about a week before installing in my car. Then I made a spare just in case.


The 7805 family is a little sensitive to output capacitance. It could be that or a setup issue. I have used them for years on military electronics and they are usually solid as a rock. I had trouble with mine on my cuda too. Maybe some sort of mopar witching thing.....
 
The 7805 family is a little sensitive to output capacitance. It could be that or a setup issue. I have used them for years on military electronics and they are usually solid as a rock. I had trouble with mine on my cuda too. Maybe some sort of mopar witching thing.....
You guys know more about this than I. Two observations that may be relevant.
1. When I tested the gages with a contant voltage source of 3.1 to 3.2 Volts, the pointers all swung 7/8 full scale.
2. Same gages connected hooked up on the circuit board with 22 Ohm resistors substituting for sending units, went to 1/2 scale. The analog multi-meter showed the IVR output pulses to swing from zero to 4+ Volts at most when read on the 15 Volt scale. I have a beat up analog meter that might have a 0-10 scale. If so, I'll retest.

My takeaway is that a 5 V constant may not have the same effect on the resistance wire and gage movement as the pulsing IVR.
confused-gif.gif
 
You guys know more about this than I. Two observations that may be relevant.
1. When I tested the gages with a contant voltage source of 3.1 to 3.2 Volts, the pointers all swung 7/8 full scale.
2. Same gages connected hooked up on the circuit board with 22 Ohm resistors substituting for sending units, went to 1/2 scale. The analog multi-meter showed the IVR output pulses to swing from zero to 4+ Volts at most when read on the 15 Volt scale. I have a beat up analog meter that might have a 0-10 scale. If so, I'll retest.

My takeaway is that a 5 V constant may not have the same effect on the resistance wire and gage movement as the pulsing IVR. View attachment 1715478100
And just to add a little to that.... before I trashed the original voltage regulator, I hooked it up to an oscilloscope. It didn't just pulse on and off, but had a jagged mountain sine wave shape to it, without regular spaced peaks.
 
Makes sense because it sure didn't swing the needle like a metronome. LOL
With a capture scope we could probably get a better estimate of the average over Voltage time for the IVR. Wouldn't be surprising if it was less than 5 V.
We were able to do some basic channel math on the screen captures were doing in 1998 with 4 channel dgital connected to a micro-computer.
cool-gif.gif
 
And just to add a little to that.... before I trashed the original voltage regulator, I hooked it up to an oscilloscope. It didn't just pulse on and off, but had a jagged mountain sine wave shape to it, without regular spaced peaks.

You can’t always measure an ac voltage with a multimeter. Multimeters on the dc setting have an integration (settling) time that is required to get an accurate reading. The voltage must be stable for that time and also long enough for your eye to read it.

Multimeters on the ac range are designed for 60 cycle house voltage. Any other frequency will not give you a correct reading.

I have never looked at one with a scope, but since it is damped with some capacitance, I wouldn’t expect a square wave. A bunch of wire wrapped around a piece of metal is an inductor, so you also have that in the mix.

I am assuming that since the 5-6 volts seems to work for most people, if you integrated (averaged) the voltage over a period of time you would come up with that value. As said above, if you had one of those fancy scopes like we do at work with math functions, you could come up with some real data. However, my brain hurts too much to do unnecessary math anymore, so I just relied on other people’s work.....
 
Oh? In the electronics world, that would be considered out of tolerance and would be pitched in the garbage. You might consider replacing it.
My 7806 regulators would start at exactly 6 volts and would heat up and be at 6 volts. I bench tested it under load for about a week before installing in my car. Then I made a spare just in case.
OK to be more exact... Starts ranged from 4.88 to 5.02. after 10 minutes 5.02 to 5.42. All with no load on output, just run to test before packaging. The prototypes ran in my 67 and our 73 for 18 months before the 1st retail unit went to market. I shipped over 360 units during 8 years. I know of only 3 field failures. The resistance of anything and everything changes with temperature. I'm not the electrics wiz though, my brother is.
 
OK to be more exact... Starts ranged from 4.88 to 5.02. after 10 minutes 5.02 to 5.42. All with no load on output, just run to test before packaging. The prototypes ran in my 67 and our 73 for 18 months before the 1st retail unit went to market. I shipped over 360 units during 8 years. I know of only 3 field failures. The resistance of anything and everything changes with temperature. I'm not the electrics wiz though, my brother is.

Ok, that makes sense, the 7805 also acts poorly with no load. Obviously worked fine when installed
 
If anyone identifies a source for the nichrome or someone who is rewinding boards, that would be great.

The heart of the problem of the replacements is the board and the float arm length.
See Fuel Sending Units and A-Body Fuel Tank Map

@Cuda Al shows his repair in detail -
Fuel Sender Rebuild

as does this How to article (except he gives up on fixing a board with busted wire - as I did at one time)
OEM Fuel Sender Repair 1967 Dart


Thanks. Good info.
Part numbers I looked up in the FSMs were:
1967 p/n 2257 493
1973 p/n 3621 615

Several changes in fuel formulation in th 70s. One of them may have resulted in greater reaction with brass.

That is exactly what I was looking for!

@dart67 your mailbox is full, would you PM me I would like to get some data on the specifics of the OEM gauge based on your thread (the dumbass I am I threw out 2 old nasty ones when I did the daughters Duster....)......

Fuel Sending Units and A-Body Fuel Tank Map
 
-
Back
Top