One thing leads to another... mean 318?

273 said

I get that and have said exactly that multiple times so far and agree with what you have just said besides the condescending end part. Yes adding stroke or any means of displacement is gonna increase torque to a given combination.

But here's where i seem to differ from you guys, "RPM" to me rpm is on par with Torque, and yes adding displacement is gonna add torque but it's gonna come at the cost of RPM.

So more torque by adding displacement and lowering rpm powerband doesn't necessarily mean more power "hp". Is this last statement wrong ?
This has been my whole point.

Click to expand...

Potentially so. You keep pointing to a longer Stroke as a rpm limiting factor which it is not really as hurtful as you make it out to be. Having seen 4 inch armed stroker’s spin to 7500 and better tells me that your statements fall short of the actual facts which you claim can’t happen. You really need to do your homework!

as time goes on with your comments, you seem to be getting a better and better grasp of how things work. However, I fear for some reason that you may have your head stuck on the online calculators too much. While they are an excellent tool, they are not the end-all, or the last say of what will actually transpire. This is why I said earlier, I can’t wait to you hit lotto so you can put into action all of your theories. Why would I say that? Because you’re going to find out that you’re not correct.