One thing leads to another... mean 318?

This isn't me changing my point of view but in that question they all won't make the same power,
So now you agree with me thatthe 273 cannot make the same power as a larger engine even though you said it would earlier. WTF!?!?! Back pedaling now are we? Are you sure you know what your talking about?

[QUOITE]take the two extremes displacements 273 vs 408 at the same piston speed of 4000 fpm, so 273 would be at 7250 rpm and a 408 would at 6000 rpm.
Could build for higher piston speeds but ratios will be the same between the two engines. So a 273 would displace 573 cfm of air at 7250 rpm at 100% VE and a 408 would displace 708 cfm. [/QUOTE]
Is this your excuse as to why the 273 can not make more power than a 318, in which you said, could indeed make more power?!?!?!?!?!?!

[/QUOTE] When taking things to the max, smaller bore can't spin high enough over come the larger bore but compare a .030 over 360, so 365 at 4000 fpm would be at 6704 rpm and would displace 708 cfm's on pare with the 408.[/QUOTE]
Agreeing with me again that there is no way a 273 can make more power than a larger engine?
Come on now! Whgere is that Chmpion of the great and power OZ like mysterious 273 power????

At that point now you would have to argue fictional hp loss rod ratio benefits etc..
Ridiculous to bring that up in a general argument or even a technical one but for a scienecefair, you can fun with that next to the snakeoil guy on the right and the guy selling shoes on the left.

273, your turn ing yourself into a carnival act! Stop brother stop!!!!!