Cams choice, Low CR vs VE%

273
I'll give you an example from Jones cam which I did run through the camdoc
256 @.006 or 264 @.004
202 @.050
.305 lift
some others 256 @.006 and larger 204 @.050
but near as fat at .200
why?
Jones is real short at actual seat to seat - say .002
shorter than Howard or Lunati or comp 256 cams
so at .050 he has not caught up
but by .100 and .200 he has more area under the curve
go to .275 (no use using .300 on a .305 cam) he is 50% bigger than the MP 260 which is about 268 in .006 degrees
Jones really short actual seat to seat builds the most dynamic compression of any of these "256" or "204" class cams and has more area to boot
great lobe
he does not have any other Mopar HFT lobes
I think he advises to go solid if going bigger- can't argue with that