dart
I disagree with above comment CCrower may have some universal grinds but IMHO yhis is not one of them and neither are the 267HDP or 271HDP and Crower's lube saver lifters are a great product ...Crower use .005 for advertised?
" Just for the sake of comparison, here's Crower's version of the same profile. Crower Compu-Pro Performance Level 3 Camshafts 31240'
Not talking about high rate cams like Howard's "agressive" series
here are some targets for intakes lower or higher lifts options
@.006 @.200 lift 1.5
250 126 .454
252 126 .481
255 128 .478
256 130 .454
256 tbd .461
257 130 .483
261 134 .494
262 138 .475
263 136 .498
265 138 .502
267 140 .506
268 145 .494
The intake is going to determine your dynamic compression which is key for driveability, part throttel and under 3,000
you could add a column for intake close point
the .200 duration is before and after your iCL intake centerline- which is near your maximum intake velocity- which uou do nnot want to restrict with a one size fits all profile
so take your old school suggestion and plug it in
see how much more durration you have to run to get the same area and how much DCR you looseIt's not about top end hp- just spinning it faster can hide thar
It's power all along the curve where chevy cams suck
Read what UDHarold said about the differences in his cam designs ending with the voodoo serirs
he claims 25 HP
back when we were runing heads up wee'd kill for 5 hp, or even when running stock
