Differences in Formula S Emblems

pishta said
ahh, hold on....your absolutely correct, the '443 is (wrong?) in this online '65 parts book http://jholst.net/65-parts-manual/fenders.pdf (printed Sept 1964!) as I took off 2 442s from my never been apart 65...? WTF? Good catch. My pins are both horizontal on a 4-1-65 build date. I hope this at least debunks the "1 'S' badge on a 65" and '442's and 443's were side specific' thoughts. @Stephen Mulkey , did your 66 and 65 pic research show pin orientation? can you share that pic of the 65 that was 'not as flat' as the 66? Pins horizontal or vertical? Now I'm curious......Here is a supporting post on your side.
"Chrysler Parts Catalogs (online?) show:
#2579 442 fender emblem '65 Formula S
#2579 443 fender emblem '66-'68 Formula S
...65 'S' emblems mounting posts were horizontal in placement and 66-68 were vertical. "
Even the 'bowed' 65 '442s dont follow the '65 curved fender 100%. Ill correct that post calling out the 443 part number as bad data.
<<<that thread is locked, I sent you a PM>>>

Good morning Pishta,
I would like to first thank you for your offer to buy the badge because of the miss information. I feel you tried to help with what you had, thanks again but I'm going to keep it and check it against the fender that's on the car. As it is, someone must have put a vertical pinned badge on it. The only fender to accept it has both orientation of pin holes in it. Have no idea if it was factory or owner placement but i think the later.
But to answer, my quest to see what's up with the difference between 65 and the 66 + I was only able to see the placement and notice how flat the fender looked, nothing with the pins.
Your pictures of the curve relief on the back is interesting as to how little there is. When i receive the vertical pin badge, I'm going to set it on the fender for giggles and picture how it fits.
Now the saga continues. Have a great day everyone. :)