Young Mopar fan bringing the A-925 to life.

Not to be pedantic, but not in all cases. Modern systems use additional video data context to produce surfaces rather than simpler point-in-space data that older scanners did(often laser, or sometimes physical touch systems). This sophistication cuts down on the clean-up and geometry creation after the fact.

My original point was that the work necessary these days is vastly less than it used to be. The first cmm-scanned surface I dealt with took a crew of 3 more than a month to turn into something usable. The last set of parts I had scanned took an afternoon and we had parametric solids by the next day with a crew of me :)


Ok, I'll play along... the scanner doesn't know what an edge is, that is a single break in a plane. it "sees" a crap ton of points that can be used to "guess" with a high probability of being correct, that a bunch of points, situated closely together, within a certain tolerance, "could" be an edge . further, point clouds, that are turned into STL files are just a collection of triangles that make up a mesh...

Scanners don't "scan" STL's anymore than a radar knows what and aircraft "looks" like. The scanner could have software internal to it that does a conversion to an STL (a shell) but even if you scan a "knife" you are likely to get an "edge" made of a billion points.

And yes, I 100% agree that things have gotten easier, but the beginning "point" (pun intended) is still a point cloud, regardless of what the machine spits out.


Fair?

-=C