I was able to find some weights on rods and piston pins but not the piston. I think the weight savings is very little, if any.
Molnar Connecting Rods H-beams
-6.760" length
-Big End Bore: 2.500”
-Big End Width: 1.017”
-Pin End Width: 1.140”
-Bolt: 7/16 ARP2000
-Pin=
-1.094"= 852
-0.990"= 849
So with the rods, same manufacturer everything the same width, length, even the bolts. Between the 1.094 and the 0.990 pin there is only a 3 gram difference. Sure there are lighter rods out there but I wanted an apples to apples comparison.
Mahle piston pin:
-Length- 2.52"
-Material- Steel
-1.094= 153 grams
-0.990= 148 grams
So again same manufacturer same length. There is only a 5 gram difference between the pins.
JE piston pins:
-Series 51
-Length-2.930"
-5115 low carbon steel
-1.094= 170 grams
-0.990= 151 grams
Here your up to a 19 gram difference. But I still think the weight savigs would be used up with the extra aluminum in the piston.
The only thing I can't find is the exact same pistons with the different pin size. To compare.
So when everything is kept as similar as possible. If you were building an engine and you had the choice to use either pin I don't think there is actually a weight savings. In some instances there is an advantage to using the smaller pin, for example if you were building a stroker and the pin is close to the oil ring a smaller pin would get the oil ring a little futher away. But for weight saving I don't think there is any.