Slant 6 Aluminum Performance Head

For exotic niche market products like this, cost will always unfortunately be the downside. So naturally, with better designed port configurations may also come better and different intake port shapes and sizes that may no longer allow the existing intake manifolds or current headers to bolt on. So possibly new intakes and headers may be required because the ports are larger, or taller or spaced farther apart. Then comes the valvetrain, I would design it to use roller rockers and shafts already available for the SB or BB Chrysler engines as well as the valves, so those parts wont be custom or hard to find if someone wanted to build their head themselves.
The problem w/the rockers is the Slanty rocker is longer as is, does use the same shaft dia as the B/RB, and shifting the valvestems to a shallower(closer to vertical to the deck) angle may solve that issue,....but isn't going to return any real flow gains. Unlike SBC's & BBM's, the /6 valves are well placed in their tiny bores, & relatively easily deshrouded within those limits. Believe Me, l considered canted intake valves actuated by custom rockers with the roller tip angled & wide enough to follow the cant thru the lift cycle from a common stock shaft, with thrust washers & billet hold-downs to control the lateral loading. In the end, there just isn't enough room to put meaningful cant in w/o rockers running into each other. When l say l've given this a lot of thought, l ain't F'n around....& when l say l've got ideas...Ditto.......