Compression ratio too high for 91 octane?

-

CR-MOPAR

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
36
Reaction score
33
Location
Saskatchewan, Canada
Hey I need some advice, I’m looking at a 340 that’s been stroked out to a 410. Compression ratio is 11.8:1, I’m thinking that might be too high for me as id like an engine that will run 91 octane. I know it depends on a lot so here it the info the seller sent.


The 340 stroked to make 410cid, it's an eagle forged crank, eagle H beam rods, Mahle flat top pistons, the block has Milodon 23 degree splayed billet caps, comp solid lift cam, comp magnum adjustable shaft rockers, 2.08 stainless 11/32 stem int valves, 1.60 stainless 11/32 Ext valves, edel Brock Victor JR super int manifold, it should with a good quick fuel 750 cm carb and an msd ignition make very close to 500hp, it is 11.8:1 compression
 
Not enough info. Need head info and cam info. Everything.
 
I asked him he didn’t know cam lift/duration. Heads a cast iron x heads

Then there's no way to answer the question. Can he give you a cranking compression number?
 
Last edited:
Then there's no way to answer the question. Can he give you a cranking compression number?
Come on, now. There is NO streetable cam that can accommodate 11.8 compression and iron heads. Whatever cylinder pressure that may be "bled off" at low rpms that may reduce detonation there.....will certainly come back as the rpms climb and the cam comes into it's operating range.
I had 10.8 with aluminum heads and a big cam and mine still knocked on 91.
 
Short answer as others have said here is not a chance especially with Iron heads. The 91 octane is **** fuel already here in Canada and will definitely require octane booster. I'm using worked eddy aluminum heads, 10.5 compression on a stroker and have to use octane booster to get the engine to run efficiently.
 
From what I see here on all the threads, unless you really know what you are doing, don't attempt to build a near 12/1 iron head engine and expect to run it on 91 octane pump gas. Just sayin'
 
From what I see here on all the threads, unless you really know what you are doing, don't attempt to build a near 12/1 iron head engine and expect to run it on 91 octane pump gas. Just sayin'


Yep. It can be done. You just have to get all your ducks in one row and happy.

I’ve seen it fail miserably because the cam was compromised. It’s not about getting a “big” cam, it’s about getting the RIGHT cam. It’s about getting the cooling system in shape so you can control engine temp and lower it. It’s about getting the ignition system tuned up for the application. It’s about tuning it once you get the engine done.

The tune up window gets smaller as the CR goes up. By the time you get to about 11:1 on pump gas the tuning window is about the size of a pencil eraser. Past 11.5:1 it’s about the size of the tip of a needle.

I almost forgot...converter/clutch, gear ratios and driving style make a huge difference. If you aren’t willing to get the RIGHT converter then you have to keep dropping the CR to get it out of detonation. If you aren’t willing to gear the chassis accordingly, forget about compression ratios that high. And, if you think it’s cool to be in high gear at 10 MPH and stomp the throttle you’ll never keep it out of detonation.

I can make anything detonate if I load it hard enough. You just can’t drive like that and expect to not make it rattle.

And lastly, for the umpteenth time, CR doesn’t know what the head is cast from. The engine has no idea it has cast iron or aluminum heads. This was clearly proven on an episode of Engine Masters. Comparable iron and aluminum heads made comparable power (very close in TQ and HP...well within the margin of error) and the only way to make the iron head have issues was to heat load the engine to the point it would run on at shut off.

No one in their right mind would heat load any engine like that.

The ability of the head to transfer heat to the coolant in the time you go from steady throttle position to the point of load detonation is so quick that it’s impossible for the cooling system to ever respond. IOW’s, what is happening is happening so fast no head or cooling system can reject the heat that fast.

One last time because it matters. If you think 200-205 degree engine coolant temps are the ****, then plan on dropping your CR about .5 for every 10 degrees of coolant temp. I can’t remember where I read those numbers, or how they came up with them but you have to run the engine coolant much lower (and then tune for it) than that to run the CR up that high. Plus, lower coolant temps make more horsepower. FWIW, if you run the engine coolant down to 160 and the cooling system can maintain that you need to run a lower grade of oil. I’m going to use 0W20 this time around instead of the 5W30 I was using.

Oh yeah, I always forget. Running the CR that high with an intake manifold that has a heat crossover is a guaranteed detonation maker. Again, you have to tune for a cold intake. You can’t just bolt it on and go. A cold air intake manifold will take a different tune up than a heated one.

If you are concerned with atomization (we all should be) it’s better to do that with the correctly designed booster and port surface finish rather than heating the intake with hot exhaust gasses.

My dad bought a brand new 3/4 ton Ford pickup in 1985. The last year Ford used a carb on their trucks. What a steaming pile of whale dung that thing was.

It was probably less than 8:1 compression and towing the race car you couldn’t keep it from rattling. I fought it like crazy but couldn’t get a handle on it. The cam timing was atrocious. Ignition timing was the same. I tune the distributor some but I wasn’t going to change the cam in that pig.

One day I was working on that junker with the air cleaner off and I noticed the fuel vapors coming out of the vent tubes. You could smell them. That’s what made me start looking at it. If you stood in the right place you could see the vapor coming off the vents.

So I pull the carb to see what’s going on and I look into the manifold. It is coked like crazy. So I pull that huge pig iron intake off so I can clean it, and the bottom of it at the heat crossover was bright blue. It was getting THAT hot.

No way on planet earth would any carb, with any tune tolerate that. Just garbage. I cleaned it up, put it back together with a gasket that blocked the heat off and it ran a bit better, but it wasn’t happy. So my brother and I waited for my mom to go on vacation to Hawaii to visit her sister and we took my dad to the Dodge dealership.

We traded that junker off on a Shelby Dakota (my dad should have kept that) and called my mom to tell her he was getting a new truck right before he signed the papers. Not much she could do that far across the Pacific. You have to pick your battles right.

Anyway, I said all that to say you have to be systems oriented when you want to run what has become unorthodox compression ratios on pump gas. You can’t just buy a big cam. Or drop the coolant temp. It’s the right cam, the right tuning, the right gearing and all that.

If you aren’t willing to do the full meal deal, drop the compression ratio. If you are, you can be rewarded with an engine that makes gobs of torque, will run cleaner and drive better and most likely be much more fuel efficient (BSFC).
 
explain how a flat top on a 68cc X head gets 11.8:1. Just askin.......

and without AL heads. perfect quench and reverse cooling, I'd think that thing would ping like a rattle can.
 
explain how a flat top on a 68cc X head gets 11.8:1. Just askin.......

and without AL heads. perfect quench and reverse cooling, I'd think that thing would ping like a rattle can.


I’ve never seen where reverse cooling was enough to make a difference. If you drop the coolant temp it make an engine much less detonation prone.

And again, because it keeps getting said...aluminum heads will not allow for a higher CR, nor do they reduce detonation one iota.

Watch the engine masters episode where they test it. They had to abuse the engine to get the results everyone wants, and that is iron heads cause detonation. They do not.
 
explain how a flat top on a 68cc X head gets 11.8:1. Just askin.......

and without AL heads. perfect quench and reverse cooling, I'd think that thing would ping like a rattle can.

Easy with a 4 inch stroke.
 
^^ yup, a flat top on a 4.00 crank is 11.8CR. completely missed that. Yikes!
 
100LLtank 002.JPG
 
Yep. It can be done. You just have to get all your ducks in one row and happy.

I’ve seen it fail miserably because the cam was compromised. It’s not about getting a “big” cam, it’s about getting the RIGHT cam. It’s about getting the cooling system in shape so you can control engine temp and lower it. It’s about getting the ignition system tuned up for the application. It’s about tuning it once you get the engine done.

The tune up window gets smaller as the CR goes up. By the time you get to about 11:1 on pump gas the tuning window is about the size of a pencil eraser. Past 11.5:1 it’s about the size of the tip of a needle.

I almost forgot...converter/clutch, gear ratios and driving style make a huge difference. If you aren’t willing to get the RIGHT converter then you have to keep dropping the CR to get it out of detonation. If you aren’t willing to gear the chassis accordingly, forget about compression ratios that high. And, if you think it’s cool to be in high gear at 10 MPH and stomp the throttle you’ll never keep it out of detonation.

I can make anything detonate if I load it hard enough. You just can’t drive like that and expect to not make it rattle.

And lastly, for the umpteenth time, CR doesn’t know what the head is cast from. The engine has no idea it has cast iron or aluminum heads. This was clearly proven on an episode of Engine Masters. Comparable iron and aluminum heads made comparable power (very close in TQ and HP...well within the margin of error) and the only way to make the iron head have issues was to heat load the engine to the point it would run on at shut off.

No one in their right mind would heat load any engine like that.

The ability of the head to transfer heat to the coolant in the time you go from steady throttle position to the point of load detonation is so quick that it’s impossible for the cooling system to ever respond. IOW’s, what is happening is happening so fast no head or cooling system can reject the heat that fast.

One last time because it matters. If you think 200-205 degree engine coolant temps are the ****, then plan on dropping your CR about .5 for every 10 degrees of coolant temp. I can’t remember where I read those numbers, or how they came up with them but you have to run the engine coolant much lower (and then tune for it) than that to run the CR up that high. Plus, lower coolant temps make more horsepower. FWIW, if you run the engine coolant down to 160 and the cooling system can maintain that you need to run a lower grade of oil. I’m going to use 0W20 this time around instead of the 5W30 I was using.

Oh yeah, I always forget. Running the CR that high with an intake manifold that has a heat crossover is a guaranteed detonation maker. Again, you have to tune for a cold intake. You can’t just bolt it on and go. A cold air intake manifold will take a different tune up than a heated one.

If you are concerned with atomization (we all should be) it’s better to do that with the correctly designed booster and port surface finish rather than heating the intake with hot exhaust gasses.

My dad bought a brand new 3/4 ton Ford pickup in 1985. The last year Ford used a carb on their trucks. What a steaming pile of whale dung that thing was.

It was probably less than 8:1 compression and towing the race car you couldn’t keep it from rattling. I fought it like crazy but couldn’t get a handle on it. The cam timing was atrocious. Ignition timing was the same. I tune the distributor some but I wasn’t going to change the cam in that pig.

One day I was working on that junker with the air cleaner off and I noticed the fuel vapors coming out of the vent tubes. You could smell them. That’s what made me start looking at it. If you stood in the right place you could see the vapor coming off the vents.

So I pull the carb to see what’s going on and I look into the manifold. It is coked like crazy. So I pull that huge pig iron intake off so I can clean it, and the bottom of it at the heat crossover was bright blue. It was getting THAT hot.

No way on planet earth would any carb, with any tune tolerate that. Just garbage. I cleaned it up, put it back together with a gasket that blocked the heat off and it ran a bit better, but it wasn’t happy. So my brother and I waited for my mom to go on vacation to Hawaii to visit her sister and we took my dad to the Dodge dealership.

We traded that junker off on a Shelby Dakota (my dad should have kept that) and called my mom to tell her he was getting a new truck right before he signed the papers. Not much she could do that far across the Pacific. You have to pick your battles right.

Anyway, I said all that to say you have to be systems oriented when you want to run what has become unorthodox compression ratios on pump gas. You can’t just buy a big cam. Or drop the coolant temp. It’s the right cam, the right tuning, the right gearing and all that.

If you aren’t willing to do the full meal deal, drop the compression ratio. If you are, you can be rewarded with an engine that makes gobs of torque, will run cleaner and drive better and most likely be much more fuel efficient (BSFC).


Hey Yellow Rose, Great analysis as usual. I've read other articles comparing iron vs Aluminum heads and they generally agree with you but most comparisons are done on GM small blocks . Probably the same results with Mopar small blocks but I haven't seen one. Temp management cam selection and timing seem to be the biggest factors to address to control detonation when using 91 octane but, as you said, after going above 11 to 1 compression the tuning window evaporates quickly. The op's engine is at 11.8 . This is a race car motor in my opinion and is specific to track use only, probably set up to run av gas. Hence my comment that it is not suitable for a street engine. Love the analysis you provided though, always informative!!
 
Come on, now. There is NO streetable cam that can accommodate 11.8 compression and iron heads. Whatever cylinder pressure that may be "bled off" at low rpms that may reduce detonation there.....will certainly come back as the rpms climb and the cam comes into it's operating range.
I had 10.8 with aluminum heads and a big cam and mine still knocked on 91.

Camshafts don't "bleed off" anything. That's not how it works. For a camshaft to lower dynamic compression, the intake valve closing event, or IVC must be "late" in comparison. In other words, the compression is "never there" with a camshaft that has 40 degrees IVC for instance, with one that had a 70 degree IVC. The 70 degree IVC closes 30 degrees later, thereby decreasing the amount of mixture that's pulled into the cylinder, so it was never there to "bleed off". And yes, there are indeed camshafts out there that can make 11.8 pump gas friendly with iron heads. The static compression ratio is only one of many variables to look at when considering which fuel you can run.
 
You notice where I used quotation marks to indicate sarcasm for the "bled off" reference.
Also, I stated "streetable cam". A guy that runs a cam wild enough to reduce the dynamic compression ratio wouldn't use iron heads in a build, would he?
 
You notice where I used quotation marks to indicate sarcasm for the "bled off" reference.
Also, I stated "streetable cam". A guy that runs a cam wild enough to reduce the dynamic compression ratio wouldn't use iron heads in a build, would he?


I am, because it’s what I had.
 
You notice where I used quotation marks to indicate sarcasm for the "bled off" reference.
Also, I stated "streetable cam". A guy that runs a cam wild enough to reduce the dynamic compression ratio wouldn't use iron heads in a build, would he?

I did.
 
I'm with RustyRatRod on not jumping to conclusions without more details. Without the dynamic CR, how can anyone answer the question with certainty? One crucial factor that I haven't seen mentioned, unless I missed something reading through the thread, is the OP's elevation, which impacts cranking compression and therefore dynamic CR.

I take it that people claiming that 11.8:1, iron heads, on 91 octane is impossible have never bummed around the pits at Bandimere Speedway. Here in Denver at 5,600', the elevation robs us of approx. 15% cranking compression versus sealevel, and that's with a less aggressive cam. Add more cam overlap and the dynamic CR gets skewed further. 11.8:1 here would have a dynamic CR that acts more like 10:1 at sealevel, which is certainly doable on 91 octane. I beat on a 383 with 11:1 compression, iron heads, 91 octane. No issues. I wouldn't have any hesitation trying for 11.8:1 if someone wants to buy me the pistons, cam, and converter:D Not everyone lives at sealevel.
 
Last edited:
-
Back
Top