Few questions on radiator tube size

It’s NOT just about flow. It’s about surface area too. If you look at the thermodynamic equations that govern heat transfer, the two biggest components are surface area and flow.

So no, you can’t just say bigger tubes and fewer rows are always better. That’s 100% not true.

It’s a balance between flow and surface area. The Champion 3 row radiator, with .75” tubes, cools my .060” over all iron 340 pushing 400+ hp just fine. And I drive it all summer in temps as high as 110* F. Giant tubes are just as much of an advertising gimmick as adding more and more rows. You don’t need (or want) a 4 row radiator, just like you probably don’t need or want a 2 row with 1.5” or bigger tubes. Anybody that says different is trying to sell you something. And probably never had any education in thermodynamics.

Between a 3 row with .75" tubes and a 2 row with 1" or 1.25" tubes the cooling numbers would come down the specific manufacturing details of that radiator. But I've seen both work just fine in an A-body, so unless you have more than the published information saying one is better than the other is just personal bias.


I’m not disagreeing. I said the 1 inch tubes are plenty for what he is doing. And yes, it’s not just about tube size. I’d take two tubes (or in the case of my truck) one big tube over 3 or 4 all day long.

It’s also important that there is turbulence to keep the coolant in contact with the tube no matter what size it is.

I’ll say it again. It pays long term dividends to fit the biggest radiator you can, run a high flow pump as fast as you can and still keep the belts on and let the thermostat do its job.

It would be educational to test and see how one or two cores compare to three or four cores compare at various flow rates.