I see what you did there.
Are you saying that everyone has to agree? You know, if I don't like someone, I'm free to put them on ignore. Trying to shame people into silence is not good.
So what if 72 and YR get excited in their arguments, does that invalidate any of their points or the data that they provide? Why do you assume that people here besides yourself are unable to handle any prickly discussion? Stop trying to protect me from harsh language and mean words. I'm pretty sure I can handle it. It's one thing when it's just a few posts are going back and forth, and I can recognize that it's another matter when a discussion gets nasty and never-ending. Often in that case, it's someone baiting another into continued argument.
I appreciate that the above two mentioned guys BOTH presented good information, and I am grateful for that.
Why don't you ask yourself who is in the wrong? The prickly grumpy old guy with back pain, or the passive aggressive (for example, this comes from my own personal "lived experience,") ex-wife who just can't stop poking and poking and poking to get a reaction? It's NEVER EVER the constantly passive-aggressive cheating ***** who gets off on baiting and tormenting others, that is responsible. I get it, the grumpy guy automatically loses with many folks.
I don't care how an argument goes as long as GOOD DATA is being presented. Show me where I am wrong, or sell me on your idea. But, don't lie, or try to sugarcoat bullshit and ignore passive aggressive ****-disturbers.
