Thoughts/opinions on Blueprint Engines 408 stroker crate engine?

Being a tier 1 manufacturer, we manufacture, machine, or produce, many of our own parts. Cranks are an example of that. We use the same foundry as the other big name guys that everyone flaunts over, and bring the crank to our facility to balance and machine. In a cast steel crank, vs fully forged, it comes down to the process and material is just worlds beyond what was avail in the 70's. Same goes with pistons. There are alot of wives tails that follow around engines, that are rooted to the quality of parts avail in the 70's. Heck, there are still some people that will tell you strokers in general are problematic because of the rod angle. Our R&D department, and nearly 400000 BluePrint Engines in circulation would say differently:)
So anyways, to the crank specifically. The only thing adding a forged unit to this engine would do is increase the cost. We have cars using this engine running into the 11's out there, and it's one of those things if we didn't think they were adequate, we wouldn't use them. Having never broke one to my knowledge, it's doing its job. These engines make power into the low 6000's as they should for street/strip use. They are built to live, not ring out every last HP. Mopars are hard enough to keep the cost down on, so if I don't have to charge someone another 300 or 400, and the engines make it through all our testing, that's a good day.

This background is very much appreciated. Can you share which OEM your company supports?
In any case, hearing that you machine the cranks to your own specs goes a long way. Clearly BPE is taking ownership over the performance and functionality of this part of the engine. That says a lot.

No doubt, cast cranks are vastly better than they were in the 1970s...but this makes me curious. I have a modern Ford in my garage with a V8 engine (that makes less power than a 408 stroker) and Ford, not known for being particularly "generous" saw fit to include a forged crank shaft in the Coyote. This particular engine has a higher rev limit than the 408 but also a shorter stroke length (presumably similar piston speeds...too lazy to do the math :) ). It also has sophisticated fuel management which undoubtedly reduces the punishment taken by the rotating assembly. So if it's just old wives tales that say modern cast cranks aren't up to the task for a street performance engine, why did Ford go this route? And yes, Chevrolet uses a forged crank in the current gen LT1, Dodge uses a forged crank in the 6.4L/392 motor as well.

The question isn't specifically directed at Johnny Mac...