Spark plugs. Why is it so hard?

Note entirely. Both platinum and iridium deal with heat better. As a result, they can be run 'hotter' without as much concern for preignition. That means the plugs stay cleaner, and they also stay sharper longer - which means better spark for longer, or better spark with a 'hotter' ignition system longer than a copper plug would last. It also means that they deal with non-ideal conditions better since the plugs are better able to fire with increased EGR, sub-optimal AFR, and will put up with abuse for much longer than copper.

My take is this: tune with copper, fine-tune with platinum or iridium after and then enjoy the car. There's no reason to run a tuned-up engine with anything but platinum or iridium, especially with a souped up ignition (MSD, etc). IMO: copper doesn't last, doesn't stay in-tune (no one replaces plugs before fiddling with the carb), and aren't well suited to anything but stock applications. As soon as you have more spark, more cam, more abuse, copper just stops making sense.


I wouldn’t argue any of that. My thinking is plugs are cheap. I still am not sold that other than the fact that the center electrode is a fine wire that the fine wire plug does any better at firing than a copper electrode. Even in the link Bewy posted the author never really developed any thoughts that I haven’t heard before, and that is the life span of these plugs is better. I’m still in the camp that if you can get to your plugs the copper electrode is better. I think that some wear of the center and ground electrodes makes firing the gap much easier and more consistent up to the point they increase the gap so far the ignition can’t keep up. I think this is a case of the technology adapted by the OEM’s doesn’t always translate to what people on a forum like this do. I also appreciate your comments on plug wires. I’ve spent a lot of money on plug wires with very low resistance and they were not half as good as some plug wires that had more resistance. It’s marketing hype for sure.