340 intake on a 318?

You all must be driving in your sleep! To put a set of 360 340 heads on a 318 without matching the ports is a waste of a lot of time and performance. To start with the ports are large enough the 318 is going to suffer in response and power. If you match the ports in the heads than it would work acceptable but not optimal. I tried it and wound up installing a 273 single plane and the engine came to life. The engine had ported heads with headers and early 340 cam. It ran fair with the 340 intake but I had already done a match up of the ports. Now if you use the 360 heads with the 1.88 intakes and the manifold stuff lines up a lot better and upper rpm perf is a lot better but the low end suffers some. It's the same with any engine accept a BBC which is always under valved no matter what combination is being used until you get up around 2.030. READ up on cylinder heads and port design. Some here are saying just run it but if it's worth doing, do it right and match the heads up to it. You will be glad you did. I ran mine with a TQ at first also and it worked ok but it worked be with the AVS and the small port 273 intake, it was way better off the bottom and the top didn't seem to suffer much, it was noticeable but I dealt with it because I like anyone else isn't in the throttle to the floor all the time, just part of the time and an engine that stumbles off the line is nothing to brag about no matter how hard it runs above 3k, you've already lost the race and playing catch up isn't a winners game.
Go tell what's left of Chrysler they're asleep too because they did it with millions of 318s right from the factory.