Poly Engine what was good/bad about it and why is the LA better?

Oops, forgot about the smaller register of the early 273's. One interesting factoid: When I swapped a later 225 into my 65 Valiant, I had to open up the pilot hole in the flywheel to fit over the later crank. But when I swapped a 340 into my 65 Barracuda, the 273 flywheel fit perfectly as is. I haven't had a 273 crank to eyeball in almost fifty years, but I assume from the foregoing that the early 273 crank register has the same outside diameter as the later ones, but a smaller inside diameter?? So it could be machined to clear a later torque converter?

Anyway, as to balance, according the Hot Rod's December 63 article about the new 273, since the 273 crank and rods were the same as the 318, but the pistons were lighter, "an extremely heavy-walled piston pin is used in the 273 to bring total reciprocating weight up to that of the 318. This eliminates the need for special balancing. . . ."

Yes, same outside diameter to match the inside diameter of a flywheel, but, the inside diameter is smaller on the 273 for the early 904 converter button. And as I mentioned, the cranks that came in a manual trans car were finish machined for a pilot bushing. Most automatic cranks weren't. With a 318 crank, that's no big deal because a Magnum pilot bearing will work fine in the big register. With a 273 unfinished pilot hole, that bearing won't fit, so, you either have to machine the register hole bigger, or, hone the pilot hole smooth and machine down a bushing to fit. In the times where I swapped cranks between a 273 and 318, the balance was never way off, but, also, never close enough for me. I always rebalance an engine anyway when doing a rebuild, so, not an issue with me. For up to 5000 RPM, sure, probably not an issue, but, higher RPM's with new aftermarket and oversized parts along with machining everything, I feel much better when everything is properly balanced.