Speedmaster vs Edelbrock air gap intakes

Ive had both on the dryer and eyeballing them told me the flanges were the same, both dropped onto a 360 with no gaps so the angles were correct. The Edelbrock port shape was not good. None were the same and the port divider wall was like a noodle. one bowed into the other port a nd one was not straight. The clone had perfect ports (they are not sand cast but permanent mold cast so they are way more consistent). IF you were to port match both, this is not a factor. The Edelbrocks plenum was larger and the intake was slightly taller so the plenum volume would be greater in the Edelbrock. The clones runners may have been smaller but I could not tell, it would have been that close. I had a polished version of the clone, a big CHINA on the flat bottom. I paid $20 for it on craigslist from a Chevy guy who bought it used but didnt realize it was for a Mopar. For a street car with under .500 lift, I think it would actually work better than the Air-gap due to the smaller plenum.