Trick flow heads

Yes it is true. Smarter people than you have proved it. Ruined valve stems & locks doesn't mean that it was a spring problem.
D. Vizard quote from his BBC book:
[1] 'All this [ BH spring ] adds up to to a spring that needs less of it's own spring capability to control itself & therefore has more to control the valve train'.
[2] 'Typically, you can drop 15 lbs on the seat & as much as 40 lbs over the nose & achieve the same RPM as a good conventional spring. Also even with the reduced spring forces, the valve train is better controlled through out the rpm range.'

Four Stroke Performance Tuning by A. G. Bell.
On BH springs:
'Its reduced diam at the top allows for a lighter retainer. ...it allows a spring pressure reduction at full lift of of around 10-20% without any reduction in safe engine speed.....cutting both parasitic losses due to friction & valve seat wear. This is possible because of the BHs superior harmonics....Each coil increases in diam compared with the coil above, so each coil has a different natural frequency which helps dampen spring surge'

There was a bad batch of Comp Cams BH springs I believe about 15 years back, which CC acknowledged.


Yeah tell that to the guy writing the checks. That was with Ti retainers. Of course the spring manufacturer said Ti retainers are bad and stuffed some tool steel retainers up his rear. Same issue. Then they said to drop the seat pressure. Did that and it laid over half way down the front stretch and pounded the seats out. And he had Ti valves. I can’t remember who he was getting those springs from but I ended up with PAC non beehive springs at the same seat pressure and it stopped. So what you or Vizard says means nothing to me. You are a professional big mouth that hasn’t seen the performance side of anything. A beehive spring might be ok for low rpm, low performance stuff but anything other than that they are a waste of money.