E-street vs Promaxx vs 440 Source

Which head ?

  • E-street

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • Promaxx

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • 440 Source

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • Stick to your 452's, and do a little work

    Votes: 7 23.3%

  • Total voters
    30
-
A properly built 440 at the 500hp level, longevity isn’t at issue.
What do you think people were doing for decades before you could get budget friendly aftermarket cranks and rods.
100% agree. They don't have to spin to the moon to get the HP either.
 
For 500hp, it never has to see 6000rpm.

485B70EF-35B6-403D-8282-B2AE934D1C68.png
 
Kind of what I'm thinking. I think if I have "a little better head", and a little less cam, my HP will be there.

Your in box is full.

Dave Freiburger once said, “Afford the best head you can.” I have to agree with this. Since the cylinder head is where the power is allowed to be made or not. This goes for any engine displacement.
I get what your saying in terms of not over buying. But you are in a catch 22 when it comes to making lower. Skip the better head and use more cam to obtain more rpm’s or spend on a better head, use less cam, make more street usable power. That equals less converter and gear.
 
Don't ask a question unless you are prepared for the answer. As for me, I always think there is more. I get what I can get. But I've never built for 400 hp hoping to at least get 300.... LOL.
I love sending you on your fact-finding missions LOL I love how you suggest...
There's another member that's always suggesting that they've done this and they've done that and that other people aren't as good as they are at it LOL....
 
A properly built 440 at the 500hp level, longevity isn’t at issue.
What do you think people were doing for decades before you could get budget friendly aftermarket cranks and rods.
Totally agree properly building the motor. Slapping some aftermarket heads on is not what I call a properly built motor..
 
Your in box is full.

Dave Freiburger once said, “Afford the best head you can.” I have to agree with this. Since the cylinder head is where the power is allowed to be made or not. This goes for any engine displacement.
I get what your saying in terms of not over buying. But you are in a catch 22 when it comes to making lower. Skip the better head and use more cam to obtain more rpm’s or spend on a better head, use less cam, make more street usable power. That equals less converter and gear.

i agree with this
tempting to use some factory cast iron heads if they will do the job with quality work, but if you could spend a little more and get 75% of the way towards the really good heads (trick flow), then i think that's a good choice.
I'd get Promaxx for the 440...but they haven't been able to get any castings for over a year now...
 
Last edited:
Not to sound like I’m bragging, but A 500hp 440 built using reworked stock heads is a “no brainer”.

But not all reworked stock heads are equal.
They don’t need to be awesome for that level of performance....... but they do need to at least be “good”.

The heads should be done to a level that’s commensurate with the rest of the build.



I totally agree with the above and the same goes with stroker engines. If you younger guys never had an opportunity to read the early Mopar manuals that most of us old timers had two copies of and wore out the pages of. They gave us the blueprints needed to go by. In today’s society there is so much BAD info going around that it would be easy to put together a bad combo. Stoker engines with suck azz heads and small cams. Stock stroke engines with heads double what they should be running. So many questions are answered in those old books.
 
I totally agree with the above and the same goes with stroker engines. If you younger guys never had an opportunity to read the early Mopar manuals that most of us old timers had two copies of and wore out the pages of. They gave us the blueprints needed to go by. In today’s society there is so much BAD info going around that it would be easy to put together a bad combo. Stoker engines with suck azz heads and small cams. Stock stroke engines with heads double what they should be running. So many questions are answered in those old books.
You've never built a stroked 440?..
 
Stock heads can get you there easy enough . I had a 440 out of a New Yorker with maybe 9:1 compression , home ported 906s using MP templates and 2.14 intake valvles , small solid roller (.550ish) , 6 pack intake , 2" Hooker headers thru 2.5" exhaust out thru the tips, J-Convertor , Mopar electronic ignition ....
It was enough to push my 3950 lb 1970 Charger down the track at 12.30 @ 112 mph with 3.55 gears.

I also had a 440 (71 NYer bottom end) with a 284/484 purple stick and a TM7 with 906s in my 74 Shortbox 4x4 Powerwagon that would aniliate 33" tires thru 3.55s. It was unerving to drive in the rain with out going into 4WD . I yanked it and put it in my 65 Coronet 500 . It ran 12.90s with 3.91s.

I dont see why you would need aftermarket heads to break 500 horse.
 
For what most would be doing at the race track with a “500hp” BB build..... imo, “heads” would be a more cost effective path than a stroker kit.
I agree. Just slapping these suckers on I went from 12.90 to 12.48 with minimal tuning probably had more in it. Cam and converter would really wake it up.
 
I agree. Just slapping these suckers on I went from 12.90 to 12.48 with minimal tuning probably had more in it. Cam and converter would really wake it up.
You do realize the op is looking to see tens?... Also LOL I might add... LOL...
He's fixing to see 12s in his farm truck with the small block that he has...
 
You do realize the op is looking to see tens?... Also LOL I might add... LOL...
He's fixing to see 12s in his farm truck with the small block that he has...
I have nothing in this engine except for tiny cam.
 
The op says he's bought a trailer....


Ok I’ll try to simplify what I am trying to say. A stroker isn’t needed to run 10’s. There I said it. Let say he’s going with a big block at 3400 pounds. Stroker not needed to run 10’s. Let’s say it’s a small block at 3400 pounds. A stroker is not needed to run 10’s. Now can you do it with ported cast iron heads? Yes again
 
You do realize the op is looking to see tens?... Also LOL I might add... LOL...
He's fixing to see 12s in his farm truck with the small block that he has...
I don't doubt a sb can do it, I prefer a big block.
 
448, stock crank, ly rods, heavy trw pistons, 260cfm 906’s, Torker 2, 850 carb, 2” headers.......3670lbs.......10.60’s @126

That was In the mid-90’s.

Short block built in 1981, was my daily driver back then.
Drove the car from Sacramento Ca to Vt in 1983.

C4313C8C-1AE0-4D2E-B073-BEDA7C7F2FA0.png
 
Are the 452’s reasonable to use?
Re working the OE heads is cheaper than new aluminum?
 
Imo, The feasibility of reworking iron heads depends on what the machine shop costs are in your area, and how much you can do yourself.
In most cases, at my shop...... Stealths would be the cheaper option.
 
Just to mag, cut, hopefully new valves, bronze guides, and a valve job on 50 year old heads puts you nearing 3/4 the cost of new aluminum heads, if not more.
 
Imo, The feasibility of reworking iron heads depends on what the machine shop costs are in your area, and how much you can do yourself.
In most cases, at my shop...... Stealths would be the cheaper option.
Yeah around $800 -$1,000 or more now since I priced it last no brainer.
 
-
Back
Top