So —- A 27 inch tire is the missing factor!
Edit…. “meteorologist”, LMAO..
I tell ya AJ, your posts contain missing information and assumes. You do this often enough to make me question very post you put up. Much like your 38mpg 450hp 360 engine.
As for PART-1
Like I said once before, from a 27" tire, to a 24.5" is 10%, about the same as one gearchange.. But who runs a 24.5 on the back of a street machine?
I stopped quoting the tire size a long time ago cuz it's just about a non-issue.
325/50-15 is 27.8
295/50-15 is 26.6
275/60-15 is 28
275/50-15 is 25.8
Average is, wait for it, . . . . . . 27.05 . . . . . . Missing factor? Grow up.
I tell ya what Rumble, just for you, one more time so I can stop repeating myself;
Rumble;
From this day forward, I will always and ever more, base all relevant math on a 27 inch tire which is 84.8 inches roll-out. I never want to hear you ask for a "missing factor" again.
As for PART-2; Just cuz you do not know how to do it, does not mean that it is impossible.
Much like ;
Why I take no meds; because this body that I am steward over is working perfectly, despite it's age, ancestry, and genetics. Just cuz you do not know how to do it, does not make it impossible.
And besides; You got my engines mixed up;
>the one that has the big power, has the 230/237/110 Hughes cam, 10.95 Scr, and was/is the one that went 93mph in the Eighth. In case you need the missing factors; they are @3457 pounds@900ft elevation. With 3.55s this one cruises at 65=2240 with the GVod.
> the one that got the big mpgs had the 223/230/110 Hughes cam, 11.3Scr, and only went 106mph in the Quarter; wait for the missing factors, here they come; 3650pounds and something like 730ft elevation This one had the A833od AND the GVod behind it and with 3.55s cruised at 65=1600,
AND NOT ONLY DID YOU GET THAT WRONG, but:
the 230* cammed engine, by it's trapspeed and weight, according to the Wallace Calculator, (the only numbers I have ever quoted), was only making 432hp.So you exaggerated that.
the 223* cammed engine, by it's trapspeed and weight, again according to the Wallace, was only making 335hp. At over 185psi Cranking cylinder pressure, this is a P/V of 160. That is a very significantly higher number than even the 68 440 Magnums. So yeah, it had bottom-end, perfect to cruise with.
And finally, that 223* cammed engine only got 32mpg, so you exaggerated that too.
I guess your memory ain't what it used to be eh?
I tell ya Rumble, since your memory is so bad, and you are prone to exaggeration, and making misleading statements, including half-truths; I gotta wonder, if this is enough to make me question every post you put up..........................
