@318willrun, is it true that a smaller intake valve ( 1.88" ) with good port work flows better than a 2.02" intake valve and no port work. Would the smaller intake valve be good for port velocity.
I never got that the valve and throat is the most restrictive part then the bowl but also shortest part of the intake tract, wouldn't the mouth of the port and intake runner be the major contributor to velocity? Wouldn't make sense to make the valve and bowl to be able to keep up with the rest of the intake tract.
