Yep, that’s what she said on the phone but my reply was it’s no matter to me because they thought of it first. They floated it and only retracted after people questioned it. It shows motive and direction on their part.
If your elected official said , “We’re going to jail anyone who says boo about about the government.” but 12 hours later said, “ We’re not actually going to do that.” would you not want to look at different candidates?
I believe that is an apples to apples comparison. I think I am justified in in my dissent.
It matters to me that PayPal even had the thought of doing social credit score type tactics.
