How much for 71 Thermoquad?

Try reading your own literature. The 1930 patent carb that YOU introduced into this thread is substantially different to the 72 TQ:
- it has no air bleeds. The TQ has three.
- the nozzle at the exit end has one hole in it. The TQ has two.
Any fool could see this is going to have an impact on metering characteristics.

you use the patent carb as the pin up carb when it has significant metering differences to the TQ design both the 71 or 72
:rofl:
it has no air bleeds. The TQ has three.
- the nozzle at the exit end has one hole in it. The TQ has two.
Any fool could see this is going to have an impact on metering characteristics.
:rofl:

You cant even tell the difference between designs and you call yourself a carb guy.



Thanks for the laughs. Yep I was right you cant tell the difference between emulsion and solid fuel metering.



Chrysler documented the loss of performance of the 72 over the 71 design, but in your mind: don't let the truth get in the way of a lie.
I'm still waiting for the source.......Make sure you provide the visual evidence and the page before it too :lol: