David Vizard bench flows a BBD 2bbl

And that test was mostly a guess. They were holding the carb down by hand. With duct tape for a gasket.

Was it sealed? No. They pretty much guessed at the leakage.

Were the butterflies centered over the bores in the carb plate? I doubt it, but how do you know for sure?

Why not drill the plate for the carb and bolt it down with a gasket?

Again, I will never understand why Vizard and Wood wanted to hook their names and reputation to something like this turd.

And yeah, offset grinding the crank and “lightweight“ pistons are already diverging from the original claims.

Does anyone actually think that maybe they shot off their mouths and are trying to unscrew what they claimed?

And, when you start knife edging counterweights you can get into some serious balancing issues.

The clusterfrick has begun.
The original intent from UT was a 318 maxed out.
Then in there live (I think it was) they moved from the stock 318 cubes to mentioning striking the stock crank.

So anyone that thinks there moving away from the original plan is correct to the point when they discussed it further and opted out of it before it was in stone.

Further videos have them stating there only removing metal for the project and NOT sticking to the 318 only cube build rule.

This was on both channels.
Always wondered what these carbs flowed just out of curiosity so enjoyed the video.

Most surprised at DV failing to mention an important, & limiting, aspect of raising the rocker for supposedly increasing the ratio. The rocker ratio is generated in two parts, the prod side & the valve side. Raising the rocker to use a longer prod might be detrimental to the overall ratio because it changes the geometry detrimentally on the prod side.
Watch DV’s video on how rockers work. While you are correct in a wrong pushrod length shortening the overall lift because the geometry will lessen the ratio, the opposite is also true.