What I will agree to is seeing some proof of your claims. There has been none yet....
- The reason you want me gone is that I am one of the few on this forum who stands up to you & calls out your BS.
- I thank you for at least admitting that the HEI adv system is a good system. That you say the system is the greatest ever & nothing comes close are your words, not mine.....
- The reason you don't provide answers/evidence is you don't know/haven't got any. If you really had 'something' that would shut me up, we would have seen it my now after 100 + posts.....
- arrogance? Is that because I have the gall to call out your BS.....
- if you had evidence of MSDs duplicity in it's the tech specs it provides, we would heard it by now.
- & now you are having a bet each way. Post #106 you say the 44 mag does produce more spark current than batt & coil, but I have given two examples of that being WRONG & the opposite is true. You have no proof or evidence, as usual.
- MSD doesn't use RMS to rate their mags, according to you. I couldn't find any info to support this or any other brands such Zig, Vertex or Mallory. Here's the thing, moron. There are only three ways to rate alternating current: peak, average or RMS. Peak is the peak of the sign wave, the highest value. Average is 0.636 of peak & RMS is 0.707 of peak. If MSD uses average, then the energy value is actually HIGHER than the RMS of the industry standard by a factor of 11%. If MSD uses peak voltage, then it is lower......which then further weakens your nonsense about the 44 mag producing higher sec current than bat & coil because the sec current would in fact be lower....
- if you have the Taylor book, post the relevant page.
