400 hp 5.2l vs 5.9l Magnums

273 said
Cause me and cousin are thinking of doing a youtube channel, for one our projects he's got engineless 340 Dustee that's been sitting around a decade or so and I got a beat up Grand Cherokee that we could do a series on low dollar build and do some racing with them. So I was looking at 5.2l magnum builds and notice how close they were to the 380 hp create engine. And thought some would be interested.

Excellent!!!!! You have a channel up now?
Do so post it up!

273 said
I don't care what people build as long they know what they’re getting into. I only defend 318 cause people's criticism of the 318 are way over exaggerated like performance part ceases to function in a 318.

Oh I’ve been down that path a few times!

273 said
If I was to push only one mopar engine it would be a 440 pretty much no matter what power level were talking.

The reason I'm thinking 5.2l for me and my cousin is there pretty easy to get around here fairly cheap and streetability ain't a huge concern, mainly though we're starting off NA but plan on playing around with nitrous, ebay turbo's etc.. So buy a few extra if we blow them up we blow them up :)

LMAO! Now that sounds like spirt!

273 said
Yes what an engine makes at the dyno/crank is important but what is more important is what actually gets to the ground and when. And gears are a major part if that.

:)

See there and before your comparing engines and when someone stated the superiority of the larger engine you made and excuse for the engine in a one up man’s hip manor of adding gears to multiply the torque of the engine output which was misleading and false and stupid since it can be done to the other engine.

It was a moot point to bring up and then to further the craziness of it you move the engine argument which you lost you double down on the suspension issue which shouldn’t even be brought up in an engine discussion. It’s retarded.

273 said
Yes I have, Kewl

Good!