Is More Flow Better, Is The Smallest Intake Port That Flows The Most The Best

If it doesn't fit ones narrative...he will think/talk around it.
There is such thing as too big but, we aren't talking about too big.. we are talking about properly sized here vs small as possible.
Example...Charlie's head goes turbulent after it's 'big performance'...because it is too small...in lamens terms..
Velocity is what we are after...but too much is too much...and it starts ripping from one side of the bowl to the other, blocking any flow increase to the point of flow loss.


I just mentioned this video set yesterday or the day before in the Dvmia318 thread and said it would make for a good opener of discussion in another thread .
Watch Chad spiers video now, 3 videos.
Target velocity ... know the territory.
Some here 'who only mention others accomplishments' get carried away with velocity/small port ideas and boast of ridiculous 318 power and 3.23 gears and 11's in the 1/4...but does anyone believe those claims from these people?
Have we seen any proof or even head work pics? Flow sheet ,time slip...anything? Nope!
So dont fall for arguing hypotheticals with bozos who are dancing in fantasy land. You want a port with enough cs, aka big enough for the airflow passing or it will be LESS than optimal, not more.
Velocity is obviously important, but a lot of people are scared so much by it for some reason they throw away power by being ultra conservative with parts selection, I blame ford tunnel port 302 and boss to some extent and guys putting untuned or poorly tuned 750 on their **** combo turd engines like a 305 with just an oversized cam and untuned 750 holley and blame the carb cause it runs like ****.