A 3.58" stroke isn't a very long stroke. Taking an equal built 340 and 360, 4-5-600hp where is the shorter stroke in an advantage? I doubt that 98% of Mopar guys will ever build an engine to take advantage of the rpm capability of the .27" less stroke.
The rpm advantage of stroke, pistons speed for most don't come into play especially if we're talking same crank material. It's head flow a 360 is gonna need more port to turn the same rpm as a 340.
There one thing were leaving out is a 360 is less than 6% bigger, even though torque is tied to displacement in a narrow ish range but range* is huge enough that a 340 could make same even more torque just needs 6% + more in lbs-ft per cid .
