OK, this then I’m done.
I said you have a subsidy that made your system more economically feasable. I couldn’t care less what YOU do, except I’m sick of subsidizing all this ****. Any and ALL subsidies should end tomorrow and that’s because today has passed.
I did the math. The **** doesn’t make sense for EVEN if I took a subsidy which I won’t. I don’t take handouts.
If the junk was so good, it wouldn’t need subsidies to make it happen would it?
As for recycling all all that **** you hype as enviromentally sound you miss the big picture.
You want to feel good about what you do and virtue signal how wonderful it is because SOME of it gets recycled.
Never mind the environmental DISASTER that happens to make all the junk that goes into solar. Or wind. Or any of the other crap put forth as feasible replacements for oil. You can parse it any way you want, but it’s a F ‘ing criminal disaster. But you go on and tell us how great it is.
Phreakish laid it out pretty clearly, and rather than read and consider what he posted, you want to keep going. You can posture all you want but it won’t change the facts.
Just an FYI, I started researching solar (and other) so called eco friendly sources of power in 1981. The technology has moved forward SOME, but it’s just not a viable option for the reasons many have posted.
Somewhere at home I have a paper I found and copied when I was in college. It was a PhD in several fields. And in that paper he absolutely proved how big a fallacy all these “alternatives” really are.
Between oil, hydroelectric and nuclear this country could have energy costs drop my a huge number.
