750 Brawler vs 650 AVS 2 at the track, right OOTB !

No they don't. Both triple stage boosters and annular boosters increase signal because the are more restrictive. What is "correct" is to reference the booster signal required to the vacuum generated by the engine. Again stick a Dominator (1050) on a 318 and tell me all about atomization when you don't create enough vacuum to actually lift the fuel up through the main well and out to into the booster channel.

Triple stage Boosters actually double the depression by multiplying the depression created by the initial booster.

Here's none other than John Kaase clearly showing the pulsations that take place in a manifold. What do you think is pushing his finger back towards the carbs? Look at all that "atomized" liquid fuel on the walls and runners making its way to the intake valve..........

Amazing Video: Jon Kaase Tests Airflow Dynamics With His Finger

What do you think those pulsations will do to carb signal? What do think all that black **** on the underside of the air cleaner is and how does it get there?

Once again, you are talking bullshit. There are annular boosters out there that do NOT restrict flow and make more power. Just because you don’t know it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

And EXACTLY how many CFM does an annular booster drop flow? Maybe 5 CFM? so thats 20 CFM per carb. Maybe. Yet there is 100 CFM difference between a 650 and a 750 so you still have (potentially) 80 CFM more.

Your “use a small carb” (or port, or header or whatever your slant is at the moment) to “vaporize” the fuel better is a CRUTCH. And it’s the WRONG answer for performance.