Intake choice.

That Performer RPM looks suspiciously like a LD manifold.

View attachment 1716090518

View attachment 1716090519


From the article I linked above.
05 mopar small block intake edebrock ld340
Edelbrock LD-340 Shallow Port Match
Scatter279.2 - 314.1 cfm
Spread35.0 cfm
Average299.7 cfm
Test note:This was the best 4BBL intake for small-block Mopars for many years. This particular manifold (borrowed for testing) had a port match that was only -inch deep. The flow is impressive for an ancient dual-plane, but the flow bench does not always tell the entire story.​
Show All
06 mopar small block intake edelbrock performer rpm 7176
Edelbrock RPM
Scatter248.6 - 264.9 cfm
Spread16.3 cfm
Average255.9 cfm
Test note:This intake has an excellent and well-deserved reputation and has taken the place of the LD-340. This is one of those cases where the flow bench does not tell the whole story. This manifold did not flow as much as the LD-340, but it will produce more power. Why? Look at the manifold intake runners. Notice how the port shape and runner arrangement has changed from the older LD-340 to the RPM. The runner lengths are shorter and the cross-sectional areas are more consistent from the plenum to the head. Lots of flow work and testing went into the newer intake design which paid off in horsepower.​

Tom