Why would low lift head flow hurt power?

rumblefish360 said
It’s so funny, I feel the same way, why oh why did I try and reply to you when you just like to argue and split hairs against anything you can followed by word twist and blaming others for your short comings.

Why did I take this freakin carrot?!?!?

Honestly where did I try to argue with you?

273 said
I get and generally agree with what you said, He stated he's talking under 8000 rpm engines and broke it down to .500-.650 cam lift engines were they focus on heads .300-.500 lift and engines with cams above .650 lift focus on .400-.600,

Just pointing out Al Noe set the boundaries of type of heads were talking about

273 said
and understand that .100-.200 probably don't do much and based mainly on valve size.

Kind of agreeing with some points you made

273 said
Still not getting exactly how better .100-.200 numbers is counterproductive, and even stated with bigger valves they like valve angles that hurt it.

point out i'm still haven't really got an answer, or at least got it if one has been made

273 said
Now if .100-.200 gains generally comes at sacrifice of higher numbers that makes sense,

me just restating what is what I think some are saying the reason is

273 said
just never seen anyone state low lifts can be counterproductive to power, usually people say you want strong under peak, higher average flow numbers etc...

me saying why I don't get Al Noe's statement.

There is no argument or reason to name call, I don't know how you see me through text but it seems you give me the worst interpretations.