aluminum rods vs. titanium rods: fatigue life

Just because a top fuel or NASCAR team uses something, doesn't mean it is the best for all applications. Those engines get torn down and rebuilt after every run or every race. The only durability they really care about is getting through the current event. I think using some of these exotic materials in an airplane engine your life depends on is a fool's errand unless you are intimately familiar with the material properties. I don't think asking for opinions on a forum dedicated to 50 year old cars is the way to gain that knowledge. Current engines are using forged steel for a reason. You want to save a pound or two off the airplane, eat less and walk a couple miles each morning.
I understand about the race engines torn down often and blow up, occassionally. My reason for asking here is there are some guys that are building/running modern equipment. And there is a knowledge base. I'm on a forum dedicated to the aircraft/engine I posted earlier. However, those guys/gals are pilots and builders. They don't have any previous background to speak of.
I'm just getting some basic information here. There are 2 individuals, I know of that have extensive, decades long knowledge with those 2 cyls engine. One has been racing air cooled VW's for decades. The other guy builds specifically for that aircraft application. Before I pester them, I'd like some real world background info.
FABO guy/gals do have knowledge with modern race and street applications even if it's in an old Mopar.

I hear ya' about the weight. Sure could use more exercise, no doubt. However, part of the weight requirement is per FAA regulations. To meet that requirement, builders will delete the plexigas canopy,brakes, set cushion, etc.. (brakes are not needed on a grass runway). That being said, it's still a weight reduction in addition to what I can do personally. 2 pounds is actually slightly noticeable performance difference in that aircraft.